Abyz News Links

Directory of links to newspapers and other news sources in Virginia.

All Headline News - Virginia

Constantly updated Virginia news and headlines from diverse sources.

Bacon's Rebellion

Opinion columns on state and local government public policy economic development and community development in Virginia with an emphasis on New Economy issues.

Stateline.org

A nonpartisan and nonprofit e-zine covering stories from Virginia and all 50 states.

VARTV.com - Virginia Media News & Information

Including Richmond, Hampton Roads and Fredericksburg VA - station news, listings, descriptions, backgrounds, histories, ratings and websites...

Virginia News - Topix.net

News on Virginia continually updated from thousands of sources around the net.

Virginia news for Virginia's business

A weekly business news digest for Virginia's business, technology and venture communities, and aggregates business intelligence in the form of white papers, case studies and newsletters.

In article <093.50.19.05.044569000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>Finally, a new argument! But this too fails, since it was true when
>Paul wrote
>it, that "flesh and blood cannot enter heaven". But he never wrote that
>it was
>NEVER true.
>
>WEAK!

'WEAK'? Well, if that were true, then it would still mean it is no worse an
argument than your own.

> Why would there be any difference between Enoch's time and Paul's
>time.

Because of the different dispensations. You _do_ know this word, don't you? I
have already mentioned it to you, but you ignored the rebuttal.

> Add Hebrews 9:8 (better ye- all of Hebrews 9) and it is
>conclusive. Enoch died.

No, it is not conclusive. Once again, you resort to braggadocio, boasting
'conclusive' when it is not.

What IS conclusive is that "see death" means DIE. SO that Heb 11:5 really is
clear, despite your equivocation: "Enoch was translated so as not to see death"
(Heb 11;5)

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <68E9A10F-ED2C-5748-BC1C-E7AA76BD7A4F@srcbs.org>,
Paul R. Finch says...

>"Matthew Johnson" wrote in message
>news:56FBB0F3-6AF9-E8B8-8CE3-77289A22CE66@srcbs.org...
>> In article , Sarah Kanary
>> says...

>>>"Stephen M. Adams" wrote in message
>>>news:2D166EA9-F715-A234-7739-B4F47B1462D8@srcbs.org...

[snip]

>>>> The Church wrote, collected, compiled and transmitted
>>>> the body of the canon.

>>>The individual books of the "NT" were written by
>>>individual Jewish Christians, most of whom were apostles
>>>of Christ. The canon closed with the death of the
>>>apostle John.

>> No, the Canon did NOT close with the death of John. On
>> the contrary: the NT Canon was quite different in
>> different parts of the Christian world until CENTURIES
>> after the death of John.

>The fact that different non-canonical books existed and
>were circulated after the death of the apostles does not
>prove that the 27 book collection that we have today was
>not closed.

You have missed my point completely, Paul. How did you
manage to miss it so thoroughly? Do you practice daily?

I did NOT say that the Canon was not closed because
non-canonical books existed. I said that it was not closed