Localities
Sub-Categories: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | ZDirectory of official and near official Texas community web sites.
Citytown Info TexasDirectory of official city and town, government, and chamber of commerce sites (where available).
Texas Community ProfilesTexas Department of Economic Development supplied information on some Texas communities.
Texas Facts and City IndexInformation and facts, with a list of all communities. From Key to the City.
Texas Municipal League OnlineA non-profit association which exists solely to provide services to Texas cities through legislative, legal and educational efforts.
wrote:
>> Theologically, the Holy Spirit is the author of Scripture,
>> and _all_ Scripture is given for _our_ learning. Each verse
>> of Scripture is written "directly to" the reader.
>>
>
> "DIRECTLY TO"
>
> This is what I was rebutting.
Maybe "attempting to rebut" would be more accurate.
> To state that every verse *directly*
> written to the reader is either a false statement or a poor choice of
> words.
3rd option (this is the one where _you_ would be at fault):
The reader doesn't understand the _quite adequate_ choice of
words, but in his flaming egomania, can't accept the blame himself.
I cite, again, "ALL Scripture is written for OUR learning."
Each verse is for every man. It's plain. It's simple.
It's straighforward. Nobody can read a verse of the Bible and
then assert this verse wasn't written for him.
> "Written" is the qualifier
"Written" is a verb, not a qualifier.
> The Spirit may
> either directly or indirectly relate a passage to our situation, but
> it was not "written directly" to us. This sort of reductionism
> dismisses the intent of the writer entirely.
What a laugh. I attribute to the Spirit the ability to write
"all for all", whereas you demote Him to the level of mere
human author, and _I_ the reductionist?
> Now if you were more careful in you wordage and state that the Holy
> Spirit speaks directly to us through the Scriptures, that is very much
> different.
No it isn't. It's not that people choose poor words, it's that
you are soooooooooooooo bad at English that no choice of words
can get a rational thought through your thick skull.
Bart
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
Gary
> "Bob Felts"
> news:CC27EC79-9ADF-6D82-2190-4DC0969DD7B8@srcbs.org...
> > Gary
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > No, that is not the basis for the infant's salvation. Eveyone who is
> > > ever saved is saved because of Christ's Sacrifice.
> > >
> >
> > So why are infants saved?
>
> By Christ's death God was propitiated. Hence God can save
> anyone whom He chooses. God chooses to save all infants who
> die in infancy. ( My opinion based upon knowing what God
> is like.)
>
So why does salvation work differently for adults (in your system) than
it does for infants? Why does God choose all infants, but not all
adults?
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))