Alamo Area Health Education Center (AHEC)

Supporting programs and students making careers in the health professions in an eleven county portion of south Texas, a non-profit 501(c)(3)corporation.

Board of Vocational Nurse Examiners

Regulates Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs). Includes agency events and publications, consumer information, and licensing and education requirements.

Brain Injury Association of Texas

Provides support and instructional services to survivors and their families. Offers online forum, statewide support group information, literature order form, and a newsletter for members.

Brain Injury Association of Texas

Provides support and instructional services to survivors and their families. Offers online forum, statewide support group information, literature order form, and a newsletter for members.

Brazos Area Health Education Center

Nonprofit improving access to health care by developing a quality health care workforce. Site describes programs including career presentations, anatomical models for loan, student internships, and support practice start-ups.

CHRISTUS Health System

Catholic related health organization with facilities in Texas and Louisiana. Includes facilities, history, and newsletter.

Don't METH With Texas

Awareness on the problems with Methamphetamines, also known as "METH". Addresses issues, concerns, news, and solutions to this growing menace.

Earnhart and Associates, Inc.

A healthcare consulting firm specializing in the development and management of ambulatory surgery centers. Headquarters are in Dallas, Texas and operations center is in Brownsville, Texas.

eTWCC.com

An online resource for Texas Physicians with editable TWCC-73 workers compensation forms.

Executive Council of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Examiners

Licenses physical and occupational therapists and registers therapy facilities. Site includes complaint form, meeting schedule, and survey.

Matthew Johnson wrote: (as you can see I've had a change of heart
toward reading his posts for I think I overreacted and also Steve, the
moderator, has not censored my posts to him so I retract any suspicions
I had...SO FAR :-))

>It is
>not his fault that you deny what John meant by "Son of God". For when
John >saysthis, he means the _consubstantial_ Son of God, as is shown
by John >1:1-3, which you JWs insists in perversely mis-translating.

Well, I never said it was a "mistranslation". John 1:1 grammatically
can be translated "God was the Word" or "the Word was God". But it also
can be translated "The Word was a god". Context determines which is
proper.

What I "deny" is his eisegesis of the scripture. The context clearly
shows that the logical reading should be "the Word was a God" or "the
Word was Godlike, Divine,etc"

Anyway I asked for Biblical proof that a Christian must Believe in the
Trinity or that Jesus is God to be a Christian...no one has given me
such.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Douglas Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 20:45:47 +0000 (UTC), lsenders@hotmail.com wrote:
>

>
> If the 70 weeks of Daniel represent time, they cannot contain gaps.
> Dispensational theory, which you seem to be following here, relies of
> a huge gap between the 69th and the 70th week, but time has no gaps.
>
Then why is the Church denoted as a "mystery?"
>
> You seem to have inserted a gap, jumping from events that occurred 19
> centuries ago, (the ministry of Jesus) to imagined events that are
yet
> future. This is a glaring flaw in your interpretation.
>
This "glaring flaw" perfectly and historically explains the "two
Messiahs." The distinction of the Lamb of God and the Lion of Judah.
Also, this is the exact same division which Jesus Himself unfolds when
in Lk 4:16 He divides Isa 61:1 from 61:2.

Also, Daniel 9:26 would be false if there were no division between the
weeks. The previous 69 weeks are literally fulfilled exactly "in
time." When, "in time" did the "prince" ever "make a firm covenant
with the many for one week?" You want literal fulfillment "in time"?
Fine, now show me the historical record which evidences the historical
fulfilment of the 70th week as can be shown for the first 69? The
burden of proof falls into you lap.

"The middle of the week" falls in perfectly with John's revelation
which was not written to the "churches" until 96AD. Obviously then the
sacking of the temple, 40 yrs after Christ's ascension does not fit
either Daniel's nor John's prophecies. T