Science and Environment
Sub-Categories: Air Quality | Animal Life | Environmental Organizations | Geology | Plant Life | State Agencies | Waste and Recycling | Water ResourcesStatewide public service program educating citizens about responsible action for a clean and beautiful state, including litter reduction and community cleanups. Lists affiliate and program information.
Tennessee Academy of SciencePromotes the sciences in the state. Announcements of activities and events, information for teachers, profile of the TAS journal, member database, textbook reviews, and other information.
Tennessee Association of Conservation DistrictsWorks with county units to conserve soil, water and natural resources. Information about conservation districts, program highlighes, newsletters, and other resources.
Tennessee Environmental Permitting HandbookAccess information on state environmental permits and permitting requirements.
TennesseeAgriculture.comAn online agriculture resource center providing agricultural news, market news and weather.
University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension ServiceInformation and educational programs on farm management, pest control, livestock production, yard and garden maintenance, and home and family management. Includes links to on-campus and local Extension offices and educators around the state.
University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension ServiceInformation and educational programs on farm management, pest control, livestock production, yard and garden maintenance, and home and family management. Includes links to on-campus and local Extension offices and educators around the state.
Sorry for the delay in responding. I didn't do any posting, etc, during
Holy Week, and now that Pascha has passed, and I'm caught up on all my
work, etc, I have some time to post (as opposed to just do the moderation).
lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>>lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>>>Sola scriptura is predicated on the biblical revelation that man is
>>>totally blind and incapable of properly interpreting not only general
>>>revelation but special revelation as well.
>>
>>If you are unable and incapable of interpreting the Scriptures, then
>>you can't possiby derive doctrine from them. In other words, if
>>your fundamental premise is that man is incapable of undestanding
>>the Scriptures, how then do you propose to know what they say???
>>
>What have I been writing all this while? Man must be led by the
>Spirit. Even regenerate man must learn the art of waiting on the
>Spirit. How often do we all do what we would normally define as the
>"Lord's work" yet we accomplish these things through the power of the
>flesh? This "new man" paradigm is not second nature. It is something
>which requires a determination on the part of the believer. Prayer and
>faith. Just as justification is accomplished by the humbling of one's
>self, saying, "You are the Creator, I am but the creature. You are
>self sufficient, I am derrivative," just so for sanctification. And to
>grow in knowledge is to grow in grace which is to grow more and more
>dependent upon the Lord. It is Dan 2:20-23. The paradigm illustrated
>in this passage as well as throughout scripture is one and same. Why
>is this a question with you?
So who gets this special revelation? And why do so many who claim to
have the Holy Spirit (even very godly living men and women) come to such
diverse understandings of the scriptures? And not only diverse, but flat-
out contradictory.
How do we judge between two people who claim alternate, and incompatible
understandings of the Scriptures?
>>That aside, the clear facts of the matter is that the Scriptures
>>themselves refute 'Sola Scriptura' as defined in my original post:
>>
>Again, I must apologize but I did not see such refutation in your
>posts. Perhaps you point me to one specifically or copy and paste into
>a reply in this thread.
You can read here: http://adamsemail.net/book/ysktt-chap1.html
I've raised this issue any number of times over the years.
>> Try this test: define the canon of Scriptures using nothing but
>> Scipture, with no reference to anything else. After all, per
>> the above definition, reference to anything else introduces error
>> and thus cannot be taken as dogma.
>>
>Here's