EPA's Surf Your Watershed

Environmental Protection Agency's service to help citizens locate environmental information about their local regions. Includes atlas of watersheds, how to adopt your local watershed, and watershed indicators.

EPA's Surf Your Watershed

Environmental Protection Agency's service to help citizens locate environmental information about their local regions.

Great Lakes Environmental Directory

Web directory and search engine for this North American region, including data access, links to government agencies and environmental groups, success stories, and other resources.

Great Lakes Environmental Directory

Web directory and search engine for this region, including data access, links to government agencies and environmental groups, success stories, and other resources.

National Association of State Conservation Agencies (NASCA)

News, membership and annual meeting information, policies, and newsletter.

National Biological Information Infrastructure

An electronic gateway to biological data and information maintained by federal, state, and local government agencies.

National Resources Inventory

Combines field observations with remote sensing to monitor land use changes and trends nationwide. Data and trends from inventories done at 5-year intervals beginning in 1982 (most recently in 1997).

Science and Engineering State Profiles: 1998-99

The Division of Science Resources Studies (SRS) of the National Science Foundation (NSF) publishes the report, Science and Engineering State Profiles, annually.

Student Conservation Association

Provides students of all ages in the USA the opportunity to serve and protect national parks, forests and urban communities.

Student Conservation Association

Provides students of all ages in the USA the opportunity to serve and protect national parks, forests and urban communities.

In article <131.01.12.05.769210000@srcbs.org>, Gary McNees says...
>

[snip]

>I have believed in OSAS for over 35 years. It seems quite
>obvious to me. In fact I am surpirsed that you deny it.

Don't be. There are lots of us here in the NG who have figured out that OSAS is
simply NOT consistent with much in the Gospels. Once you realize this, it
becomes easier to see that despite appearances, it is not consistent with Paul's
Epistles easier.

>Since Christ's perfect obedience is imputed to the saved,
>how can they ever be lost?

See the threads on OSAS for an answer to that.

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In typical dishonest fashion Matthew misrepresents me:

>Spurious accusations of censorship or negligence against the Moderator
>will NOT
>make you any friends. Nor lend you credibility.

if you did not post in anger and haste you would have seen this
disclaimer:

I wrote:

>I'm not saying I necessarily think Steve is doing it
>deliberately but whatever the reason it makes it impossible to
>effectively carry on a conversation.

There were no accusations other than the ones you once again level at
me. Shame on your unChristian behavior.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Bob Felts wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > Aquinas wrote that holy "
>
> More gobbledygook.
>
However, it was you who pointed the discussion to Aquinas as if he had
the answer. I replied with an overview emphasized the fact that his
Aritstolean presuppositions betrayed a true Biblical position.
>
> > Sin is 'sinning' or 'to sin' but holiness is not 'holying' or 'to
holy.'
>
> Sure it does. To be holy is to be set apart. There's a verb in
there
> somewhere.
>
Where?
>
> > Only the passive is employed in the latter case: 'to be holy' or
'to
> > become holy.' But both the active and passive are employed in the
former.
> > Man is willing in holiness and he is willing in sin. But the
willingness
> > in the first case is complex.
>
> Only because you insist in trying to set free that which isn't free.
>
> > God works in man to will (Phil 2:13).
>
> "According to _His_ good pleasure." No freedom for man there.
>
> > The willingness