Directory of Rhode Island's 39 chartered cities and towns, including web pages and lists of local officials. Maintained by the state government.

Lists the state's towns and their dates of formation, identifies the county each town is in, and identifies other populated places by county.

State municipal organization. Features organization information and details of issues affecting local governments.

In article <072.15.19.05.280760000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>> And God said:[sg] 'Let us make[pl] man in our image, after
>>our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of
>>the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
>>and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing
>>that creepeth upon the earth.' (Gen 1:26 JPS)
>
>God was evidently talking to the Word (Jesus).

This setnece would not be too far off, if you did not insist on putting an evil
'spoin' on it below:

> The Word (Jesus) was
>like God- a spiritual being possessed of intelligence- as were all the
>angels.

And this is a very evil spin indeed. No, this is very wrong. You are lowering
Christ to the level of angels. But angels are created, and Christ, the Word is
co-eternal with the Father (Jn 1:1).

> God created man through the Word (Jesus) and made man in his
>"image"- an intelligent creature endowed with free will- with God's
>main attributes: love, justice, wisdom & power. There is absolutely NO
>hint at any polytheism or pagan trinity here.

And here your evil spin reveals its true, even more evil colors! The
divinely-revealed dogma of the Trinity is NOT pagan. That is a vile slander
cooked up by fanatical enemies of Christian Truth.


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

mrhodes_47@earthlink.net wrote:

> Paul’s Argument with Peter,
> Or was it Peter‘s, and everyone else’s, Argument with Paul?
> (It makes a difference. So Paul put it in his terms, as usual.)

Scholarship? Or is it just the musings of an untrained
intellect? (It makes a difference.)



> he indicates that he

> Well, it would indicate to Paul’s audience

> I only see arguing and separation. A

> Oh, courageous, dramatic, warrior Paul.

> (I think I can l

> We don’t know what from.

> Paul’s stubbornness, likely.

> Paul is the only one I’ve heard make this statement.

> but apparently

> The apparent lack of friendship

> I sincerely doubt that;

> I don't know who

> I have difficulty believing

> So I believe

> Here Paul seems

> And therefore probably

> I refuse to believe

Truly, the words of someone afraid of the truth.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are ap