Directory of programs for parents and direct services for children, ages 9 to 17. Also includes parenting tips.

A comprehensive Rhode Island link page with links to over 1200 Rhode Island websites in 60 categories.

Articles and directory listings for familites and children. Includes recreation and entertainment, health and safety, education, services, and shopping.

A directory of Rhode Island web sites.

An internet directory for Rhode Island, including government, educational, entertainment, community, media and business links.

wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
>> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> >
>> >> You have not read very much then. I suggest the following, relatively
>> >> short work:
>> >>
>> >> "Evil and the God of Love" by John Hick



>I don't have a lot of time to waste, Steve. I'm concerned about the
>alleged accuracy of someone's analysis of Calvinism if their analysis of
>the Incarnation is incorrect. It has been my overwhelming experience
>that denial of the diety of Christ automatically leads to all sorts of
>errors. Is there not another author who has orthodox Christology who
>has analyzed Calvinism in a manner you find acceptable?

As it turns out, none is necessary. You said that you are concerned
about somone's anaylsis of Calvin if their analysis of the Incarnation
is incorrect. Since Calvin joined Nestorius in his denial that it is
proper to call Mary "Theotokos", Calvin's analysis of the incarnation
is wrong.

What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Calvin took a
position decreed to be heretical by the ancient church, a position
which calls into question his understanding of the Incarnation. If
we follow your standard, Calvin can be, in fact, must be, ignored.

-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

nnalyd@yahoo.com wrote:

>> The caption was to the effect that Jesus' sacrifice
>>exactly cancelled Adam's sin.
>
> Only in the sense as in these scriptures
>
> [ ](Rom. 5:18,19)

That wasn't the sense of the article at all. It was
quite clear in saying that ONE death could pay for
only ONE man's sin.

>>So "wow", no you don't believe that Jesus died for your
>>sins. Only that He died so you could pay for your own
>>sins.
>
> You are wrong. You don't understand the issue you are speaking of.
> Jesus died for all sins. Mine included.

I understand your doctrine better than you understand mine.



>>Further, I've had lots of discussions about Jesus' resurrection
>>with JW's. Invariably they assert that God faked the
>>resurrection by "keeping a copy of Jesus in His mind"
>
> "faked" is your own word. No JW would ever say such nonsense.

Which only means that they wouldn't use the word "fake"
when describing the fake resurrection.



> The only
> thing that's "fake" is you repr