Prayer for life

Society and Culture

Sub-Categories: Animal Welfare | Ethnicity | Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual | Genealogy | History | Labor | Law | Military | Native American | Organizations | Paranormal | Personal Pages | Politics | Religion
Christian Coalition of Oregon

Profiles the CCO, highlights latest political news, provides political resources, and informs on membership and upcoming events.

Christian Coalition of Oregon

Political action committee provides news, legislative analysis, suggested actions and links to resources.

Mid-Valley Rehabilitation, Inc.

A non-profit organization in Yamhill and Polk counties providing vocational, residential, employment and transportation services to individuals with mental and physical disabilities.

Oregon Hunger Relief Task Force

Task force created by the state legislature in order to document the extent of hunger, coordinate and publicize existing services and advocate for programs and policies.

Oregon Technical Assistance Corp.

Promotes full participation in community life for individuals with disabilities and families through the delivery of training, technical assistance, and related services.

Portland Women's Crisis Line

Help for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in Oregon with a 24-hour state-wide hotline. Includes additional resources for survivors of rape, sexual assault and abuse.



Matthew Johnson wrote:
> In article <125.10.12.05.274667000@srcbs.org>, Gary McNees says...
>
>>
>>
>>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>No. The warning in Revelation applies ONLY to the Book of Revelation. There is
>>>no sound reason for claiming that it applies to the whole Bible, since it was an
>>>independent volume at the time.
>>
>>But Matthew, you would agree, would you not, that one should
>>Not change any book of the Bible?
>
>
> Before I agree to this, I need to know if you are denying the possibility or
> desirability of doing Textual Criticism on the books of the Bible.
>
> IOW, which recension will you apply this to? And will you judge the recensors as
> guilty?

I meant no trick. I agree in "lower" Textual Criticism.

In fact, I wrote, but did not post, a post concerning this
in the thread with the blue one.

By textual analysis we can have great confidence that
what we have now is very close to the original. This
is based upon a statistical mathematical discipline.

But even with that said, some of those in the field
need to be watched carefully, as some of their work is suspect,
at least to me.

God is able to preserve His word, and has done so.

Where people have plainly mutilated God's word, such
as has been done in the New World Translation, even
a child can see the deceit, lies, and errors.

Gary

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <078.44.16.05.433720000@srcbs.org>, lsenders@hotmail.com says...
>

[snip]
>> If I had indeed failed at something, you'd be able to show, in
>> some way, some evidence of what you mean.
>
>Ahem! I just did.

No, you did no such thing. You are hiding behind pseudo-pious ramblings -- as
you so often do.


[snip]

>It is interesting how both you and Matthew always end up concluding
>your arguments based upon 1) your are the majority view and 2), the
>majority view is always correct.

No, neither of us do this. By making this wildly-inaccurate claim, all you
accomplish is to show that you have never understood either Bart or myself. I
wish I could say that this is a surprise.

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))