Guides and Directories
Includes statewide and city business, travel, shopping, and recreation information.
Oregon Citylink Travel GuideArea guide and travel information for each city in the state. Lodging, local attractions, recreation, history, medical facilities, and image galleries included.
Oregon Coast GuideA directory of the Oregon coast from Astoria to Brookings. With links to lodging, restaurants, art galleries, shopping, recreation, and services.
Oregon Info NetBusiness & services directory.
Rogue River CountryOutdoor recreation vacation planning guide and directory for Southern Oregon.
SearchOregon.comAn Oregon focused search engine with information for government, local business, dining, activities, and weather.
StateofOregon.comProvides directory of commercial business, lodging, and dining in various cities.
In article <126.12.20.05.728091000@srcbs.org>, lsenders@hotmail.com says...
>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> In article <125.10.12.05.617220000@srcbs.org>, lsenders@hotmail.com
>says...
>> >He is left with Pseudo-Dionysius who brought the Plotinian motif
>> >into direct connection with the Christian principle via synthetic
>> >theism.
>> This, Loren, is just another example of how you descend into
>> ignorance when you put on the pretence of being scholarly. And what
>> a hollow pretence it is! "Plotinian motif"? Give me a break!
> I use to give you credit.
No, you only gave token credit. For you give real credit only to those
who foolishly agree with you.
>In dismissing this analysis, I can only conclude you simply don't
>understand all that is involved presuppositionally.
No, that is NOT the only thing you can conclude. It is the only thing
you want to conclude, since to admit your own ignorance is simply too
painful for you. You misread Dionysius badly. And you had no rebuttal
for my proof that you misread him badly, so you turn to this rash
conclusion instead.
How typical of you, Loren.
>> >He does so by means of his idea of negative theology (Matthew's
>> >version in particular evidences this paradigm).
>> No, that is NOT what he does with negative theology.
>Well, technically, yes. However, in practice, no.
How would you know about the practice, Loren? You are completely alien
to it.
>> >If the Christian prinicple still keeps alive after its first
>> >encounter with the negative theology of Dionysius it does so with
>> >very great distress.
>> On the contrary: it is when you _deny_ "negative theology" that the
>> Christian principle can still keep alive only with very great
>> distress. In fact, in _your_ posts, it is not alive at all.
> Cute but it does not address the issue.
Sure, it does. It was you, not I who failed to address the issue with
your wildly off-the-mark claim.
>Again, the more I read what you write, the more revealing it is just
>how uneducated you are.
This was wrong the first time you said it, and it is wrong now.
Really, Loren. Then why is it that the people in this NG who have
advanced degrees disagree both with you and with your assessment of
me? And why is it that you are the one who writes like a heedless
student who never listened to anything they teach in high-school
composition classes, who then dabbled in a seminary but never earned a
divinity degree?
You, not I, are the one whose writing is bloated with many marks of
uneducated thinking. You continually pass judgment on things you know