Features PDF handbook, calendar, and committee reports.

Maps showing boundary changes from 1859 until the counties assumed their present form in 1908.

County fairs in Oregon.

gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:


> No man is saved against his will.

Then no one is saved, because _everyone_ is
God's enemy.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

How is 'works' supposed to be defined?

Is it 'actions' -- so as to say that faith without actions consistent
with that faith is useless? Such as a thief who continues to steal
after acquiring faith, rather than giving up stealing and earning an
honest living?

Or, that we're supposed to be out building churches and converting
pagans and so on?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

"Bob Felts" wrote in message
news:2F0B6E14-5CF7-F4FF-5A7D-7689D73F366E@srcbs.org...
> gilgames wrote:
>
> > <<
> > So why does salvation work differently for adults (in
your system) than
> > it does for infants? Why does God choose all infants,
but not all
> > adults?
> >
> > Gary
> > >>
> >
> > What about this answer.
> >
> > The infants born in the state of the original Sin a
collective
> > responsibility, which received Salvation by the death
and Resurrection
> > of Christ for everybody before and after that, unlike
the adults they
> > did not made any obstacle for the salvation by personal
sins. The
> > Passion before the death was necessary due to the
personal sins, and the
> > Grace from that saves many but not all: this is personal
responsibility
> > so requires personal cooperation.
> >
>
> "requires personal cooperation" is the same as "salvation
by works".

Only in the imagination of the Calvinist and Bart.

For others who are rational, receiving a free gift does not
require
any work.

Gary



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

vhorani wrote:
> I seen the movie for the very first time last night. There is no
words
> that descibe my feelings after I saw it. I understnad the reson
satan
> is shown many times, but why is there a child that Satan is carrying?

I believe it can be interpreted as artistic license used to show that
Satan was mocking the Madonna and Christ child. This was the whipping
scene, was it not? This was juxtaposed with Christ's suffering and his
mother nearby suffering with him while he was being tortur