Building Environment Council of Ohio

A non-profit professional association interested in problems within buildings arising from pollutants in and immediately around buildings.

Division of Water - Ohio

Collects data on surface and ground water, produces maps, regulates construction of dams, operates canal systems, and administers floodplain management program.

Federal Valley Watershed Group

Works to restore and preserve water quality, environmental health, and recreation in the watershed. Calendar of events and list of projects.

Frogs and Toads of Ohio

An introduction to the natural history of the frogs and toads of the state.

Highest Named Summits of Ohio

List of summits with elevations above 1000 feet and locations.

Office of Pollution Prevention

Provides a list of materials that are recycled, reclaimed or exchanged. Also includes links to lists of companies which recycle these materials

Ohio Division of Soil & Water Conservation

Provides information on county districts, watershed programs, education and calendar.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Mission in to protect human health and the environment through responsible regulation. Site provides publications, calendar, and news releases.

Ohio Soil and Water Conservation Resources

Provides links to districts, organizations and projects in the state.

Ohio Statewide Environmental Network

Purpose is to formalize a network of existing Ohio technical assistance organizations and agencies so that they may better provide environmental assistance to small- and medium-sized manufactures.

Stephen M. Adams wrote:

> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You have not read very much then. I suggest the following, relatively
> >> >> short work:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Evil and the God of Love" by John Hick
>
>
>
> >I don't have a lot of time to waste, Steve. I'm concerned about the
> >alleged accuracy of someone's analysis of Calvinism if their analysis of
> >the Incarnation is incorrect. It has been my overwhelming experience
> >that denial of the diety of Christ automatically leads to all sorts of
> >errors. Is there not another author who has orthodox Christology who
> >has analyzed Calvinism in a manner you find acceptable?
>
> As it turns out, none is necessary. You said that you are concerned
> about somone's anaylsis of Calvin if their analysis of the Incarnation
> is incorrect. Since Calvin joined Nestorius in his denial that it is
> proper to call Mary "Theotokos", Calvin's analysis of the incarnation
> is wrong.
>

That's not what I see on two different web sites:

1) "The early Reformers even applied, though with some reticence, the
title Theotokos to Mary . . . "
http://www.ourlifeinchrist.com/Program%20Notes/mary1_121204.htm, which
is a site related to the Orthodox church.

2) "John Calvin and other Protestant Reformers also maintained that
the Virgin Mary is "Mother of God." "
http://www.unicorne.org/orthodoxy/articles/alex_roman/luther.htm

> What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

I agree.

> Calvin took a position decreed to be heretical by the ancient church, a
> position which calls into question his understanding of the Incarnation.

Where can I find material to substantiate your position?

> If we follow your standard, Calvin can be, in fact, must be, ignored.

If you will read what I wrote more closely, that isn't what I said.
Even Satan tells the truth some time. The question is, rather, whether
it is efficient to sort through everything to find it.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

wrote in message
news:C9E31AD4-3432-66B8-A5CF-8E2F6B67D201@srcbs.org...


> It is written :
> John 1:1-3 "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
> with God, and the Word was God.

Literally, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God,
and god was the Word."

The Word was WITH God. So therefore was not actually God, else he would not
be