Dakota West Adventures

Vacation planning website. Search for lodging and camping. Links to bicycle and canoe rentals.

ElSurfo - North Dakota

Links to attractions, fairs, events, museums, parks, and historic sites from around the state.

Fort Lincoln Foundation

Fort Abraham Lincoln Foundation. Information provided on visiting this attraction.

Great Outdoor Recreation Pages - GORP

A comprehensive guide to travel, tourism and recreation in the state including activities, outdoor attractions, and maps.

Highway 281-Take the Journey

The American Legion Memorial Highway from the International Peace Garden spanning the border between Canada and the United States. Includes a photo gallery.

In Praise of the Prairie

Historical essay and links to many state attractions.

Lewis and Clark in North Dakota

Includes historical account of journey out and back, along with a comprehensive listing of sites and attractions along the Lewis and Clark trail in North Dakota.

Lewis and Clark Riverboat

Travel down the scenic Missouri River on the Lewis and Clark Riverboat. Links to Charters and departure times.

North Dakota Travel and Tourism

State of North Dakota sponsored travel information. Including attractions, lodging, events and activities, outdoor recreation, maps, and general visitor information.

The Enchanted Highway

Metal sculptures along the state's highways to display western rural art and to promote tourism. Plans include adding picnic tables and sound in some of the exhibits. Page includes photos.

In article <53D8939B-5D53-72B2-BA4B-3C45458919DE@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>Matthew Johnson wrote:

>> In article
>> , Bob
>> Felts says...

>> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:

>> >[...]


>> >> Once again, I challenge you to show me where I have
>> >> said that one can attain righteousness without the
>> >> gospel. Better yet, show me where I have said that one
>> >> can attain righteosness without grace! Or that the
>> >> righteousness is completely self-willed.

>> >Is this righteousness partially self-willed?

>> This is obviously a leading question, designed to _frame_
>> Steve with the false accusation of "semi-pelagianism".

>It's obviously a leading question designed to figure out what you guys
>_really_ hold to be true.

So you say, but again, you will have to do better than that
to make your assertion plausible. For you have had _ample_
opportunity many times in the past to "figure out what you
guys _really_ hold to be true". Yet every single time you
_squandered_ that opportunity -- just as you have done now.

> You know, for a question that has a simple "yes" or "no"
>answer, you go to great lengths to avoid answering it.

Well, both Steve and I have put many comparably simple questions to
you and _you_ have yet to answer them too. So don't complain until you
answer them yourself. Look at how long it took to get you to answer my
questions about Eze 18:23, and your 'answer' is _still_ woefully
inadequate!

Nor have you ever addressed my follow-ups to that 'answer'
of yours.

>> >[...]

>> >BTW, Steve, part of the problem with these challenges is
>> >that what you say, and what you imply by what you say,
>> >are often at odds with one another (at least , in the
>> >estimation of some who read your words). The same is
>> >true of what I write. That's why we enter into these
>> >(often heated) discussions -- to see whether:

>> >1) we really understood what you said,
>> >2) you really understood what you said,
>> >3) we correctly connected the dots between what you said and what
>> >Scripture says, and
>> >4) you correctly connected the dots between what you said and what
>> >Scripture says, and ...

>> You _say_ you want to do this, but I cannot believe you.

>I'll bite my tongue on this one.

>> I would be surprised if Steve can believe you either. For
>> your actions in this NG are not consistent with this
>> claim. See below.

>Ok, I'll wait.


>> >Having read what you wrote in the quoted section above,
>> >I thin