A site dedicated to people with diabetes, family members and healthcare professionals.

Conference designed specifically for civilian and military health professionals. Features a schedule of events.

Health care personnel to serve patients at home. Features a link to a mission statement.

In article <154.10.10.05.864132000@srcbs.org>, tuppence says...
>

[snip]

>> Not quite. He says that a man can't save himself by
>> works. He doesn't say that other men, acting as
>> the arm of the Church, won't deliver the Word.
>>
>> Bart
>>
>
>Any scripture claiming that faith comes from hearing alone?

I am _so_ glad you asked that question, 'tuppence'. For Bart has given a verse,
but insists on a questionable sense of the preposition 'by' in that verse. And
without that verse, he can have NO scriptural proof that "faith comes by/from
hearing alone".


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <9570F33D-F042-E521-E2CA-0282E2849DAD@srcbs.org>,
lsenders@hotmail.com says...

>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:

>> >I wrote and sent of a lengthy reply to this post. I
>> >guess it must have got lost. I was hoping you had
>> >merely chosen not to post it until you could post a
>> >reply. Oh well.

>> What you describe is not my practice. If I recieve a
>> post that is on topic, I post it. If it's not, I attempt
>> to return it via email. This often fails for a host of
>> reasons. I checked my logs and can not find any record
>> of such a post from you.

>Its' been almost 8 yrs since I was involved with tech
>services. But I still haven't forgotten how it all works.
>I never intended any inference accusing you of any
>administrative mischief. Honestly, I leave these things in
>the Lord's hands.

No, Loren, you do not. If you really _did_ "leave these
things in the Lord's hands", you would have had NO motive to
say "I was hoping you had merely chosen not to post
.. until...". For such a 'hope' is _completely_
inconsistent with "leaving these things in the Lord's
hands".

>> One more time - my rejection of "sola Scriptura" is based
>> on the Scriptures. They refute it. The Scriptures
>> support *our* position, not yours.

>> As for a definitive list, I'll provide one as soon as you
>> can provide a definitive list of Scriptures, using ONLY
>> the Scriptures themselves.

>Is this how you reply to someone who asks you to prove that Jesus is
>real?

You protest below that you are 'honest', but this question is itself
proof of your dishonesty. For you did NOT "ask to prove that Jesus is
real". You asked something quite different. But here you play
"bait-and-switch" with the question. That is dis