Nevada Association of Counties (NACO)

Founded in 1969 as a nonpartisan, nonprofit corporation, owned, organized, and operated by Nevada's county governments.

Nevada Association of Counties (NACO)

Founded in 1969 as a nonpartisan, nonprofit corporation, owned, organized, and operated by Nevada's county governments.

Nevada Community Action Association

Statewide association for the CSBG grantees in the 17 counties of Nevada. Gives information about the organization and its aims, online resources and training among other resources.

Nevada Community Action Association

Statewide Association for all the 17 county CSBG representatives in Nevada.

Nevada Community Action Association

Statewide association for the CSBG grantees in the 17 counties of Nevada. Gives information about the organization and its aims, online resources and training among other resources.

Nevada Community Action Association

Statewide Association for all the 17 county CSBG representatives in Nevada.

The Counties of Nevada

A Map of Nevada showing all its 17 Counties.

The Counties of Nevada

A Map of Nevada showing all its 17 Counties.

basicallyblues wrote:
> I had written:
>
> > In the same chapter (verse 18) John writes "no man has seen God at
> > anytime" but plenty saw Jesus. Jesus is not the God whom he was
with.
> > Context demands "the Word was a god" or "the Word was a divine
one".
>
> Zach wrote:
>
>
> >Both Jacob (at Peniel) and Moses saw God face to face. How do you
> >explain
>
> The Bible repeatedly says "no man may see God and yet live" so unless
> the Bible contradicts itself the statement that Moses saw God "face
to
> face" must not be literal but figurative for the closeness of Moses'
> relationship with God. Even today we use an expression "we don't see
> eye to eye" that doesn't mean we have never seen eachother. Same type
> of thing.
>
> This is confirned by John 1:18 that says "no man has seen God".

Jacob named Peni-el (Face of God) because he beheld the face of God.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Stephen M. Adams wrote:

> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You have not read very much then. I suggest the following, relatively
> >> >> short work:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Evil and the God of Love" by John Hick
>
>
>
> >I don't have a lot of time to waste, Steve. I'm concerned about the
> >alleged accuracy of someone's analysis of Calvinism if their analysis of
> >the Incarnation is incorrect. It has been my overwhelming experience
> >that denial of the diety of Christ automatically leads to all sorts of
> >errors. Is there not another author who has orthodox Christology who
> >has analyzed Calvinism in a manner you find acceptable?
>
> As it turns out, none is necessary. You said that you are concerned
> about somone's anaylsis of Calvin if their analysis of the Incarnation
> is incorrect. Since Calvin joined Nestorius in his denial that it is
> proper to call Mary "Theotokos", Calvin's analysis of the incarnation
> is wrong.
>

That's not what I see on two different web sites:

1) "The early Reformers even applied, though with some reticence, the
title Theotokos to Mary . . . "
http://www.ourlifeinchrist.com/Program%20Notes/mary1_121204.htm, which
is a site related to the Orthodox church.

2) "John Calvin and other Protestant Reformers also maintained that
the Virgin Mary is "Mother of God." "
http://www.unicorne.org/orthodoxy/articles/alex_roman/luther.htm

>