Online state highway maps.

The Johns Hopkins University hosts this map collection of Mississippi.

Find maps of cities, crops, wind directions and other references.

The Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection.

Collection of old images of the state's scenery, attractions, and historic buildings.

Publisher of land ownership maps and other map products for Mississippi. Website includes price lists and sample maps.

I am looking for complete list of New Testament references to the
canonical Old Testament.
I know I could just reread and document every time a writer mentions
the OT, but
I was hoping for a quicker method.

I should mention here that I am looking for quotes (of which I am told
there are about 2-3 hundred,
not the allusions, which number in the thousands.

Does anyone know of such a list, either online or in book form?

Your help is greatly appreciated,

you can send responses to:

stonwerk@shaw.ca

Thank you,
and God Bless!

Ron.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <72AAB2A7-A938-DA89-8982-87C6944366BE@srcbs.org>, Bart Goddard
says...
>
>matthew_member@newsguy.com wrote:
>
>
>>>> But the free will is there, and obvious for all but the
>>>> blind.
>>
>>>Really? Where does it say that the believer does so
>>>because he made a choice to? It doesn't. In fact,
>>>in Greek the phrase is indicative. It's not a cause/
>>>effect phrase, but a "this is the state of things"
>>>phrase.
>>
>> This is a glaring example of your ignorance of the way Scripture uses
>> language. Grammatically, it is a "state of things" phrase, but this
>> does NOT give you the right to jump to the conclusion you jump to.
>
>I'm not making conclusions here,

Yes, you are. You are jumping to the conclusion that Mark 16:16 has nothing to
do with free will.

> but rather gainsaying Gary's.

And your not doing that very well either.

>He's the one reading something into the passage which isn't there.

No, he is not.

>You, inadvertantly, back me up by also saying that it isn't there.

No, I am not backing you up. That you should claim I have is truly amazing. It
was YOU, not Gary, who claimed that Mark 16:16 has nothing to do with free will,
and it was YOU, not Gary, who tried to claim that this follows from the use of
the indicative in Mark 16:16. But it does not follow.

>Gary should take note.

Practice what you preach. YOU take note.

[snip]


--
-------------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
Quidquid boni habet tribuat illi a quo factus est
(Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus, Ser. 96)


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

>her unsaved husband knew enough of
>what the bible taught that he took advantage of her to the point that