Childrens Dentist Directory - Michigan

A directory of Michigan based pediatric dentists and other dentistry professionals who specialize in dental care for children.

Dental Implants Directory - Michigan

Directory of maxillofacial surgeons, implant periodontists, and prosthodontists who focus on dental implant treatment.

Dentist Directory

For people with Delta Dental Insurance. Search on-line for a dentist.

Michigan Association of Commercial Dental Laboratories

Nonprofit organization that provides continuing education for dental technicians.

Michigan Denture Dentist Directory

Statewide directory of dental practices providing fittings for dentures and repair services.

Michigan Orthodontics Dentistry Directory

Directory of orthodontists and other dentists practicing orthodontics, including invisible or clear braces for straightening teeth of children and adults.

Sedation Dentist Directory

A directory of dentists offering varying degrees of sedation services for assuring comfortable dentistry.

West Michigan Oral Surgery

Providing care for dental implants, wisdom teeth, and tmj disorders. South Holland, North Holland, Grandville, and Grand haven, MI.

lsenders@hotmail.com wrote:

>> You can't be Protestant and reformed at the same time. The
>> reformed deny the real presence in the sacrament. And this
>> is the defining difference between the two isms.
>>
> I think Princess Leah said it best: "I don't know where you come up
> with this stuff -fuzz ball."
>
> Luther broke aways from Roman to protest their interpretation
> concerning salvation. His initial intend was to reform the RC from
> within but they forced him out. So originally, they were one and the
> same. Today, Protestant is the widern term whereas Reformed is the
> narrower term. Reformed theology stands within the Protestant camp.

1. This wasn't about the difference between Lutherans and the RC.

2. Gary's own dictionary definition shows that this is
NOT the modern definition of "Protestant".

If you go outside the RC and EO, there are only two kinds
of Christians: Lutherans and wannabees.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:


>> "Accepting" is a work. It's obedience to the First Commandment.
>
> It most certainly is NOT. This is pure nonsense.
> I cannot even understand why you write what you do.

I know you can't understand it. It's common for humans
to call what they don't understand "nonsense", but that
doesn't make it so.

Most people at least grasp the concept, even if they don't
agree with it, however. Since Jesus is not doing the
"accepting", but rather man who is doing the accepting,
it should be clear that you're basing salvation upon
the quality of man which causes him to "accept". Just
because you don't think it takes any effort of muscle,
brain or will to "accept" something in no way moves the
quality of "accepting" onto Jesus. You have man saved
because man accepted. Note how Jesus doesn't appear in
the last sentence. You are flatly denying that Jesus is
the Savior. And _that's_ nonsense.



> understood in 1. above is:
>
> "Because [I believe] Jesus died for me."

Right, you are saved "Because I" not "Because Jesus."

Bart



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

It is regrettable that more than a few highly visible ministries have
tended to undermine the integrity of Christian faith and profession by
engaging religious cause as means to self-interest, greed and,
oftentimes, moral corruption.

The problem is not new. Paul wrote the Philippian church that he was
sending