Official information, forms, and links to institutions provided by the Michigan Department of Treasury.

Overview of plans in various states prepared by Mark Kantrowitz, and sponsored by the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA).

basicallyblues wrote:

> Matthew Johnson makes an inane statement:
>
> >But JWs clearly equivocate on what "Jesus as Lord" means. Whereas you and
> >I should agree: it means Lord GOD
>
> a true Christian makes a true statement:
>
> "For even though there are those who are called "gods", whether in
> heaven or on earth, just as there are many "gods" and "lords", there is
> actually to us one God, the Father, out of whom all things are, and we
> for him and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are, and we
> through him" (1 Cor. 8:5,6)
>
> and the Lord Jesus Christ says:
>
> "This means life eternal their getting to know you, thee only true God,
> and the one who your sent, Jesus Christ" (John 17:3)
>
> "'Why do you call me 'good'? Nobody is good except One, God" (Mark
> 10:18)

Then you have a problem. If no one is good, except God, then you have
to admit that Jesus was not good.

If Jesus wasn't good, then He wasn't the spotless lamb of God, and all
of us are still in our sins.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

basicallyblues wrote:
> Bart Goddard belched:
> more emotional ranting and ad hominem
>
> >The real trouble here is that JW's can't tell the word for
> >a thing from the thing itself.
>
> this sentence is a prime example of what is wrong with you and others
> on this board. You can't see past the JW thing. You have a prejudice
> that cloased your mind and heart to anything I write. Why? Because
you
> put your anti-JW glasses on when you read. All of you create
strawmen
> because it's all you can handle.
>
Mr. Blue, what ever your real name is, for all the years that I have
been in this newsgroup and in SRC prior to the establishment of this
NG, I recall no other JfW who has exhibited more hostility and acridity
that you. In some part I cannot help but conclude that this has
something to do with your insecurity. Perhaps you are not old enough
or reflected upon life long enough to have discerned such exhibitionism
to be the product of being either new to one's faith or insecure in it
is some other regard. Read Edgar Allan Poe's, "The Raven." The
insane person is the one who cries the loudest that he is sane.

As for "anti-JW glasses," there is a justification for such.
Initially, an individual should not where them. Rather he should
research the subject without bias and see what it is all about before
drawing a conclusion. However, once one has done such a thing, and has
drawn a studied conclusion, why should he not then act off such said
conclusions? In point of fact, none of us can act otherwise. We