County clerks office.

Brief history with photo, business listings, churches, organizations, and area activities.

Shows county line, major highways, some cities. Interactive.

Departments, services, and information on neighborhood watch program.

In article <123.29.05.05.385482000@srcbs.org>, gpatton@bayou.com says...
>
>
>
>
>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> In article <122.32.16.05.991342000@srcbs.org>, Gary McNees says...
>
>
>
>> In fact, I have argued before in this NG that Job 42:7 shows that Job
>really was
>> righteous throughout the entire book.
>
>
>
>It sounds like you read the book of Job correctly.

Thanks. I am glad to know that at least _somebody_ out there sees this too!

> But, you may have
>confused people, by using too many words to say it.

I think the "too many words" you are referring to say something in addition to
"Job was righteous". I was trying to explain how it is possible that many
readers do NOT think "Job was righteous".

> It really isn't
>just Job 42:7, but the book of Job as a whole that reads that way.

This is certainly NOT true of most English translations of the book.

> Job
>42:7 is just compatible with the thrust of the whole book.

Again, this is certainly NOT true of most English translations of the book.

> And of
>course, Job 42:7 would be compatible with the message the author of Job
>was trying to make, why would it be otherwise?.

I already answered that question earlier in this thread.


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:

> >That is semi-Pelagianism.
>
> You just can not avoid calling us names, can you?

It is not name calling. It is classification. To determine it to be
antagonistic in nature could be thought of along the same lines as
though who shake a finger at an expositor, presupposing that his sermon
was directed to them personally when in fact it is a moral prompting
from within.

To classify you as being among Pelagians is to merely to call attention
to the fact that you elevate the freedom of man to a point which
actually contradicts the scriptures such as 1 Cor 2:14. As I keep on
asserting, the fundamental issue on which all presuppositions proceed
involves the true nature of man after the fall. Please allow me to
quote a page or two from Muller's 2 vol. work, "The Christian Doctrine
of Sin."

_____
SIN, in its widest acceptation, presents itself in a twofold form,
either as prevailing tendency and habit of the inner life, or as a
particular and momentary act, peccatum habituale and actuale. The NT
recognizes both these forms. It has