Bob Felts wrote:

>
> The Lord of the Rings: A Source-Criticism Analysis
>
"There is neither Elf nor dwarf in Christ!"

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

matthew_member@newsguy.com wrote:

>> Here he's saying
>>that I say "God caused me to sin". I've never said
>>anything like that.
>
> Yes, you have. And yet you keep denying the consequence of your own
> words.

If I had, you'd be able to cite it. And if I "keep" denying it,
you'd be able to cite it multiply. But you can't. It just
another of your childish attempt to move the discussion off
of the topic and into your favorite pasttime: slander.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article ,
lsenders@hotmail.com says...

>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> In article
>> <4B400023-24A5-7F65-8740-273083A98DBF@srcbs.org>, Bob
>> Felts says...

>> > Aquinas is trying to have his cake and eat, it too.

>> And being a much better logician than you are, Bob,

>> >Notice that Aquinus removed the word "freely" here. Had
>> >he omitted it in the prior statement he wouldn't have
>> >landed in logical hot water.

>> He is NOT in "logical hot water". How could he be, when
>> he was always a much better logician than you are?

>Matthew, when are you going to stop being so acrid in your replies?

That was not 'acrid'.

>Tell me this, how do your caustic words bear witness to any
>degree of being indwelt by Spirit let alone led by the
>Spirit to reply?

I have lost count of how many times you have given a much
more caustic reply. And yet you dare rebuke me?

> You _may_ occassionally best an opponent by your breadth
>of education, but you repel all sensitive seekers.

Bob is clearly not a "sensitive seeker". Neither are you.

>It is to your shame in the Lord that such bitter tones come
>from your pen in defense of your denomination.

You call _that_ 'bitter'? You should read Gorky. For that matter, you
should pay closer attention to the bitter tone that often emerges in
your own posts.

>> How irresponsible of you Bob! You are accusing of
>> "landing in logical hot water" a man who not only was
>> always much more the logician than you, but whose mastery
>> of Aristotelian philosophy and logic WAS the main reason
>> Europe of his time started taking Aristotle seriously
>> a