Color Landform Atlas: Massachusetts

Various maps, including shaded relief, county, satellite image and map from 1895, from the John Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab Color Landform Atlas.

Mapathon: Massachusetts

Directory of links to mapping sites on the internet relative to Massachusetts.

Massachusetts Electronic Atlas

Create a data map from menu of subjects such as historic places, telephone Area codes, employment, and municipal revenues.

Massachusetts Maps

The Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection.

Massachusetts Maps

Maps in PDF format for state area code regions and Congressional districts. Must have Acrobat plug-in to view.

Massachusetts Mapsite

Collection of maps of the state.

MassStats

Demographic, economic, educational, health, and political statistical maps of the state using data collected from public sources. From Caliper Corporation.

"basicallyblues" writes:
>I wrote:
>
>>Yes it is a guardian and promoter of that truth but if you are
>implying
>>that the church has authority to go beyond or add to what was written
>>this is dangerously close to Mormon speak!
>
>Stephen Adams wrote:
>
>>On the contrary, the Scriptures support exactly my position. Not
>>yours.
>
>This a Matthew Johnson-esque response. Should we do the yes it does/no
>it didn'tyes it does/not it doesn't volley here?

I posted a lengthy defense of this in the article. Give me a break.
It wasn't just a bald statement without backup. You snipped my entire
defense and then berate me for claiming to teach the truth without
any backup. That's pretty dishonest.

>>Explain Charles Taze Russell.
>
>Who cares? Why are you trying to put up smoke screens? Besides the
>majority of his beliefs were held up by others throughout the
>centuries..some of which were even held by Jesus Christ.

Not a smoke screen at all! You said, quoting the Scripttures, that
private interpretation was forbidden. I applied it to the man whose
private interepretation created your religion.

>>What is Sola Scriptura?
>
>(snip) well there it is folks. A confession. Trinitarians need to go
>outside and beyond the bible to defend their heresy.

Well, since "sola Scriptura" is *not* Scriptural, there isn't a problem.

>Paul said it best:
>
>(Galatians 1:6-9)

You snipped and ignored the entire *Scriptural* argument which proved my
point.

But, let's compare what the Scriptures say about the Church and the
Scriptures. The Orthodox Church *is* following the Scriptures:

a) It meets the scriptural command of Paul to keep and maintain that
which he taught orally, as well as by letter. (1 Cor 11:12; 2 Thes
2:15; 2 Thes 3:6)

b) It meets the command of Paul to pass his teaching on to faithful men
who will teach others. (2 Tim 2:2)

c) It meets the scriptural definition that the Church is built on the
foundation of the Apostles and Propehts (who were to be obeyed when
they *spoke* as much as when their words were written down).
(Ex 19:7-8; Ex 24:3-4; Josh 1:16-18; Eph 2:19-22)

d) It meets the promise of Christ that the Holy Spirit will teach
us things not taught directly by Christ, and guide us into all
trith. (John 16:12-14)

e) It meets the statement of Paul that the Church is the pillar and
ground of the truth. (1 Tim 3:14-15)

That's a short summary of my rather long post. The JW's do NOT meet
these basic Scriptural tests.

-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus84