AccuWeather.com - Maryland

5-Day weather forecasts, maps, radar and satellite images for hundreds of Maryland zip codes.

Chesapeake Bay Observing System

Includes water temperature, currents, and salinity.

Chesapeake Bay Observing System

Includes water temperature, currents, and salinity.

Maryland State Climatologist Office

Offers information about climatology statistics and studies as well as weather conditions and forecasts.

Maryland Weather [Weather Underground]

A quick overview, with links to a detailed forecast for individual Maryland cities. Marine forecasts, and ski conditions.

Maryland Weather [WxUSA]

WxUSA is a "Weather Hub" site that offers an extensive list of weather links for over 1295 US cities including links to current conditions, forecasts, radar, maps, weather cams, kid's weather and more for each city. WxUSA is easy to navigate and use.

Skier's Forecast for Maryland [Weather Underground]

Snow conditions and available trails and runs, for individual ski areas.

Skier's Forecast for Maryland [The Weather Channel]

Snow and general weather conditions, per ski area.

The Presidents' Day Blizzard of 2003

Snowfall map and photos from around the area of the aftermath.

Weather Central: Maryland

Current conditions, city forecasts and area weather maps.

Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>
> >> Who can correct you if you think that you have the last word?
> >
> >Again as Luther demanded, show me in Scripture and by the Scriptures
> >where I am wrong. Sola scriptura.
>
> Ah, but this is NOT the concept of Sola Scriptura that is held by
> conservative evangelicals. For them, a doctrine which cannot be
> proved directly from Scripture is a nullity.

What about doctrines that contradict scriptures?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <134.18.14.05.086749000@srcbs.org>, Streamer says...
>
>
>
>
>"Matthew Johnson" wrote in message
>news:133.45.15.05.577237000@srcbs.org...
>>
>>
>> In article <133.02.12.05.177655000@srcbs.org>, Streamer says...
>>>
>>
>> [snip[
>>
>>>Now, back to the topic.
>>
>> So why are you _avoiding_ the topic?
>
>Who told you?

You did. You forgot already?

>
>>
>>>
>>>There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
>>>(Rom 8:1 RSVA)
>>
>> Wrong. I do not accept that version of the text. Nor should you. It really
>> reads:
>>
>> There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus,
>> who
>> walk not according to the flesh. (Rom 8:1)
>>
>So why did you post Rom 8:1 RSVA ?

Because I was showing you the _variety_ of different versions. Remember: I
started out with the observation that there is a famous textual difficulty here.
DIfferent translations follow different texts in this verse. THAT is the point I
am trying to make clear to you.

>> For without that "who walk not according to the flesh", you WILL
>> misunderstand
>> who he is referring to, when he sayd "who are in Christ Jesus". He does
>> NOT mean
>> everybody who ever shouted out "I believe in Jesus! I'm saved"!
>>
>Agree.
>Many people claim. But without the Spirit of God in them, it's a false
>claim.
>
>---
>This is what I've posted:
>
>Rom 8:1: There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ
>Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

And which translation are you following when you do this? Remember: that was my
original question.


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((