Delmar Web

Directory of businesses, organizations, entertainment, and services in Delaware and Maryland.

Maryland at a Glance

Quick basic reference to the state's government, history, natural resources, public facilities, and other features. From the Maryland State Archives.

Maryland Electronic Capital

State of Maryland official home page.

Maryland Electronic Capital

Directory created by the Maryland State Archives, with information about government, business climate, localities, education, and community links.

Maryland-Info.Com

Maryland directory, concentrating on malls, events, farmers' markets, and fishing.

Maryland.com

Guide to travel, city guides, community, real estate, government listings.

Marylandinfo.com

Guide to Maryland travel, community, real estate and government listings.

MarylandPet

Pet resource directory including animal shelters, rescue and adoption, veterinarians, groomers, trainers, kennels and sitters.

SAILOR: Maryland's Public Information Network

Provides public information for citizens of and visitors to Maryland, including resources for health, business, education, and history.

Toepath

Maryland and Virginia directory of services, resources, recommended places, things and people.

In the KJV I read something that goes something like this: "when God made
Adam and Eve they were naked. But sin came into the world, and sin distorts
anything. Sin distorts nakedness. Immediately Adam and Eve knew they were
naked, and they tried to make a pair of pants out of fig leaves. They still
saw their nakedness."

Today there is a common saying among some evanegelists that no people are
"junk" because God doesn't make junk.

My question is this, if God created Adam and Even naked, why after eating
from the tree of knowledge, why would it matter to Adam and Eve that they
were any less than the people God created and if God made them naked why
would they be ashamed for anyone to see them naked. The Bible seems to infer
nakedness is bad, but if nakedness is bad why would God have created them
naked.

For the past thirty-odd years husbands and wives and even close friends no
longer feel shame being naked in the presence of the opposite sex (at least
if they are husband and wife) so why would Adam and Eve even _think_ there
was anything wrong with them being naked when that was how they were
created. To think they needed clothes would, in my opinion, be tantamount to
an opinion that God make a mistake when he created them naked and we know
God does not make mistakes, so what is the explanation?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

>He didn't claim to prove the Nicene Trinity in that post. Why should
he
>have? All he needed to do is show that your claim was WRONG. And that
>he did quite neatly.

No he didn't. The Nicene Trinity *is* the trinity so you will see the
ante-Nicene writers did not believe such a thing. Once we talk about
what the trinity is we can talk about why the 1st and 2nd century
Christians did not teach it.

>This obsession wiht 'definitions' is itself unbiblical. The biblical
authors
>assumed a lot of background knowledge. They assumed, for example,
>that the
>reader knew that "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" is a reference to the
>Trinity.
>Thus:
>(Mt 28:19)

>was clearly recognized as a reference to the Trinity.

this is the epitome of circular reasoning. You are assuming what they
assumed and then you provide an opinion of scripture to support an
unproven claim.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Douglas Cox wrote:
>
>
> There is no statement anywhere in the New Testament that the 70th week
> of Daniel ended. In fact it has not ended;

In fact, it has never begun.

The Me