LAstCHANCE Racing

Schedule for Pro Stock driver Chuck LaChance. News, photos, and recent results.

Maine Forest Rally

SCCA Pro Rally held in Rumford. Schedule, results, and news provided.

Maine Forest SCCA ProRally

Based out of Rumford, Maine, includes maps and event information.

MaineRacing.Com

Coverage includes Busch North, Drag racing, karting, motorcycle, SCCA Events and race teams. Schedules and links to area race tracks provided.

MaineRacing.Com

Informative site covering motorsports racing in and near Maine. Coverage includes Busch North, Drag racing, karting, motorcycle, SCCA Events and race teams. Schedules and links to area race tracks provided.

Northeast Pro Stock Association: A Review

Features M.P. Roy's results and reports on NEPSA (North East Pro Stock Association)drivers from Maine and New England.

Southern Maine Karting

Kids get into the competive spirit with go-kart racing. Site has extensive information, including classes, schedules, novice racers, history, profiles, mini-cups, classifieds and marketing. Offers clean family oriented fun.

gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:

>> And for the umpteenth time, it doesn't say _why_ they would have
>> repented.
>
> Yes it does. It says that they would have repented had they
> seen the miracles. Don't you understand simple English?

No it doesn't. You're the one having trouble with English.
You seem to think that "If A then B" means that A causes
B. It most certainly doesn't. E.g.:

"If the little stick has a plus sign on it, then you're
pregnant". In no wise do we think that this means that
the EPT _caused_ the pregnancy.


"If steam is rolling off the water, then it's boiling".
It is the boiling which causes the steam, and not
vv.

_That's_ the way English works.

The Bible says "If you repent and are Baptized, you will
be saved". How on earth can you read into this that
repentence _causes_ salvation, and yet pretent that you
are 1. a master of the English language and 2. following
Scripture?

"If these miracles were done in Sidon, then they would
have repented." _Where_ is the causality here? It's
not there, _you_ put it in. You put it in because you
can't trust God to save people, but insist that they
save themselves.



> How do you explain Christ upbraiding those at Chorazin and Bethsadia
> for not repenting if they could not repent? Is this question simple
> enough?

And Bob has answered it plenty of times. Where did you get
the very unscriptural idea that just because God gives a
command, man is able to obey it? Certainly the opposite is
true. God have the 10 Commandments and nobody has ever kept them.
There's not one little tittle of the law that anyone can keep,
so it's utterly bizarre that you propose this theology of
"If God commands it, we're able to keep it." Scripture never
says that, and in fact says the opposite. "No one is good, not
even one."

Pharoah died for not obeying God's command, and yet it was
God Himself who hardened his heart so that he could not.


> The order of faith and becoming a child of God
> are clear and cannot be confused.

Then how do you explain the fact that you're confusing them?


> And Scripture plainly says, "believe that ye may
> become!" NOT "you believe BECAUSE you have already become," as is
> required for Calvinism to be true.

Nor does it say "become BECAUSE you believe." This is the
classic example of the drunk falling off the other side
of his horse.




>> Your view of God, however, is that He simply calls out to the girl
>> "Don't!". In which case, she goes splat under to