Color Landform Atlas: Maine

Features maps, satellite images, and landforms for the State of Maine.

GIS News

Provides news, data, standards, maps, library, and link information.

John Mitchell's Map: An Irony of Empire (1750-1755)

Displayed at the Osher Map Library at the University of Southern Maine. Provides introduction, cartographic history, and reproductions of the full map that was used to determine the boundaries between Maine and New Brunswick.

Maine Maps

The Perry-Castañeda library map collection. Maine state and national park maps online.

Maine Office of Geographical Information Service

Features images, news, data catalog, personnel, state contacts, and the Internet mapping project.

Maine: National Geographic Atlas

Printable map featured from xpeditions.

MaineToday: Virtual Visit

Provides spectacular 360-degree views from Hadlock Field, Portland Head Light, Farnsworth Art Museum, Cadillac Mountain, West Quoddy Head, Jockey Cap Mountain, Rangeley Lake, and Mount Katahdin. Audio available for Bass Harbor Head Light and Moosehead Lake. Video clip from the Kennebec River.

Road map of Maine

Showing interstate and U.S. highways plus major cities and towns.

In article <093.50.19.05.858954000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>
>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
>> In article <091.36.16.05.291484000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...
>> >
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >So we're saved because of our ability to reason?
>>
>> You who criticized BB for his false dilemma are so quick to come up with
>> this one of your own? NO, I never said that. What I said is that we are
>> not saved if we insist on using our ability to reason _against_ God, which
>> is what he does who clings to heresy, despising the true teaching of the
>> Church.
>
>But that means that:
>a) we know what the true church is,
>b) we know what the true teachings of the church are, and
>c) that we are using our reason against God.

>I don't see how you can get to a), b), or c) without reason. How do we
>know that what we know is true, Matthew?

This, Bob, is just a more complicated version of the same false dilemma. Are you
hoping to hide the dilemma under yet more incomplete choices?

>What if I am a man whose 'reasoner' is broken? Does that mean that I
>cannot be saved?

No. But you miss the point: it is BB's insistence on _deliberate misuse_ of his
'reasoner', using it to teach heresy, that damns him. But a man whose 'reasoner'
is broken is not ipso facto guilty of _misusing_ it, much less deliberately. WHy
are you muddying the waters by pretending you can treat these cases as
equivalent?

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:11:52 +0000 (UTC), "Sarah Kanary"
wrote:

>
>Mike Rhodes wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:31:33 +0000 (UTC), "Sarah Kanary"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Jam 3:17 quae autem desursum est sapientia primum quidem pudica est
>> >deinde pacifica modesta suadibilis plena misericordia et fructibus
>> >bonis non iudicans sine simulatione 18 fructus autem iustitiae in pace
>> >seminatur facientibus pacem
>> >
>> >No matter what language one speaks, Christian love is what Jesus said
>> >to look for. He said that LOVE would be the distinguishing mark of his
>> >true followers. Why? Because "qui non diligit non novit Deum quoniam
>> >Deus caritas est" 1Jo 4:8.
>> >
>> >Jesus said to look first for LOVE. True doctrine produces it, so John
>> >13:35 is the beacon by which one finds the truth. No one can stop
>> >Jesus from finding