If Terri Schiavo dies, Bush's career might die with her
________________________________________________________________________________




A new poll shows that the biggest drop in Bush support is among conservative churchgoers.

There's no big surprise in this.

Conservative churchgoers are the people who put Bush back in the White House last November.
They expect Bush to deliver.

They know Bush could issue an Executive Order re Terri Schiavo.

But Bush isn't doing any such thing.
At least not so far.

If Terri Schiavo dies, Bush's career might die with her

________________________________________________________________________________


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

In response to both posts, I'd have to ask why forgiveness and
punishment
are so often thought of as mutually exclusive. Seems to me one can and
should discipline one's child _and_ forgive them, in fact the
discipline
ideally should be a refining, rather than dismissive act. This applies
to
capital punishment too, though exactly how it does is something I don't
think
we can grasp, in the sense that we cannot see how things play out after
death, and God has not elected to furnish us with the details of how
our
souls become sanctified in the afterlife. We do know is that they do if
we
choose to put our faith in Christ, but a lot of the how's and why's of
it are just
not for us to know.

Also, I think that there is some danger in prioritizing some sins
over
others. They all essentially stem from mistrust of and rebellion
against God,
and all represent a turning away from him. I believe that in his eyes
they
are all equally grievous, but that from where we stand there are
differences,
which is why we administer different punishments for them.


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In Excelsius Dago wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:09:25 +0000 (UTC), Warren Post
> wrote:
>
> >I´m trying to understand John 1:21a, where John the Baptist denies that
> >he is Elijah. Yet Matthew tells us specifically that he was Elijah
> >(17:12-13), and Mark and Luke both make this clear as well (Mr 9:13 and
> >Lk 1:17).
>
> It's recommended that you recheck Luke chapter 1, where it says that
> John ministered "in the spirit and power