Coordinates and administers the discharge of State Government's responsibility relating to military, veterans and civil emergency preparedness.

Information about the Guard in Maine and how to join.

U.S. Army Recruiting in Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and a portion of Massachusetts. Includes a history of the BN, a welcome packet, and education services.

gpat...@bayou.com wrote:
> Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > In article <116.34.21.05.616492000@srcbs.org>, Gary McNees says...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >b t wrote:
> > >> Hebrews 4:12 - For the word of YAHWEH is living and powerful,
and
> > >> sharper than any two-edged sword,
> > >>
> > >
> > >There are NO Greek manuscripts or other writings from which the NT
> was
> > >translated that have the Hebrew or Greek equivalent of YHWH in the
> NT
> > >anywhere that I am aware of.
> >
> > You are right about this...
> >
> > >
> > >The word translated Lord is theos.
> >
> > But here you got mixed up: 'Lord' is KYRIOS. QEOS means 'God'.
> >
> > And yes, this funny looking transcription is actually better than
> 'theos', since
> > it give the spelling in Greek EXACTLY ('Q' is 'theta').
>
> Very interesting! I did not know that "Q" is "theta". May I
thetauote
> you on that?

Q is not theta, it is merely the closest Latin representation visually
to Theta.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

James wrote:

> The Bible does not support the belief that Jesus was God. Rather the
> Bible tells us that they are two separate persons.

Out of the mouths of babes. Yes, this is exactly the doctrine
of the Trinity. They _are_ two persons. But one God. Duh.

Bart
"Give me liturgy, or give me death."

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <093.50.19.05.858954000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>
>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
>> In article <091.36.16.05.291484000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...
>> >
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >So we're saved because of our ability to reason?
>>
>> You who criticized BB for his false dilemma are so quick to come up with
>> this one of your own? NO, I never said that. What I said is that we are
>> not saved if we insist on using our ability to reason _against_ God, which
>> is what he does who clings to heresy, despising the true teaching of the
>> Church.
>
>But that means that:
>a) we know what the true church is,
>b) we know what the true teachings of the church are, and
>c) that we are using our reason against God.

>I don't see how you can get to a), b), or c) without reason. How do we
>know that what we know is true, Matthew?

This, Bob, is just a more complicated version of the same false dilemma. Are you
hoping to hide