Law
Self-help legal information for state residents.
Maine Jury DutyInformation for all citizens in the state who are selected for jury duty.
Maine State Judicial BranchChief Justice's page, description of the court system in Maine, court fees, supreme court decisions, directory of courts, and legal links.
State Legal Materials - MaineLinks to primary legal resources, from Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute.
State of Maine Judicial BranchDescription of the court system in Maine, Chief Justice's page, court fees, supreme court decisions, directory of Maine courts and legal links.
lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>>
>> >I wrote and sent of a lengthy reply to this post. I guess it must have
>> >got lost. I was hoping you had merely chosen not to post it until you
>> >could post a reply. Oh well.
>>
>> What you describe is not my practice. If I recieve a post that is on
>> topic, I post it. If it's not, I attempt to return it via email. This
>> often fails for a host of reasons. I checked my logs and can not find
>> any record of such a post from you.
>>
>Its' been almost 8 yrs since I was involved with tech services. But I
>still haven't forgotten how it all works. I never intended any
>inference accusing you of any administrative mischief. Honestly, I
>leave these things in the Lord's hands.
Excuse me?? You wrote:
"I was hoping you had merely chosen not to post it until you
could post a reply. Oh well."
I guess you're technically correct - this isn't an inference. It is
an accusation - that I hold back articles when I am involved in the
thread.
>> One more time - my rejection of "sola Scriptura" is based on the Scriptures.
>> They refute it. The Scriptures support *our* position, not yours.
>>
>> As for a definative list, I'll provide one as soon as you can provide
>> a definitive list of Scriptures, using ONLY the Scriptures themselves.
>>
>Is this how you reply to someone who asks you to prove that Jesus is
>real? This sort of reply is really immature. It is also
>disrespectful.
Excuse me? You ask me a question, knowing full well that it's not possible
for me to produce a definitive list of traditions, that would include ALL
traditions. And by ALL here I mean ALL, not some subset.
>For I am honest in my search. I have honestly sought
>out just what these "traditions" are which supersede the scriptures.
Straw man. We do NOT say that our traditions supersede the Scriptures.
You again accuse us of what the ROMANS do. There is only tradition -
the Scriptures are part of it.
My question was exacty on target - and exactly the question to show that
you are off base here. Why? For you cannot provide a source list of
the Scriptures from the Scriptures themselves, and thus, you rely on
*tradition* for your list of Scripture. There is no other way, except
for personal authentication (ie 'these are Scriptures because I beleive
they are Scriptures, for whatever reason).
So, your rejection of "tradition" is quite disingenious. You have no
leg to stand on, so you resort to ad hominem attacks.
It is incumbant on you to demonstrate that you do not rely on tradition
for your canon list by showing exactly where it comes from.