The College hosts summer dance workshops with professionals from all over the world.

Guide to locate folkdance groups featuring Balkan, Cajun, clog, contra, English Country, international, Israeli, dance, ritual, Scottish Country, and modern forms.

Ballroom dance studio offering classes for all levels. Fairfield, Maine.

gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:

> 2) You cannot fly to the moon (without any machine).
> Hence you have no "free will."
>
> Such reasoning it so ludicrous that it is not worthy of response.

And yet, you responded. Hmmm....

After all this, you still don't understand enough of your
opponents' doctrine to realize that our assertion is
that it is as hard for an unregenerate person to believe
in God as it is for him to fly to the moon (or to ride
his camel through the eye of a needle.)

Bart


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Bart Goddard wrote:

> nnalyd@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
> > where in the Bible does it say that one must believe God is a trinity
> > in order to be saved? Verses please:
>
> This is the way a legalist would word the question. But Christians don't
> believe any of man's actions cause his salvation, not even the act of
> believing. So to a Christian, your question is pointless.

He didn't say anything about the cause of the belief.

>
> With the cart behind the horse, we say that those who are saved believe
> that Jesus is God.

Which is a repetition of the initial assertion.

> Peter's and Thomas' confession show this.

Peter's confession is hotly debated (between Protestant and RC, for
example); and the JWs don't read Thomas' confession the way we do.
Their reading is contrary to the Greek -- but that doesn't change the
fact that they see it differently.

> And Jesus promised to build His church on Peter's confession.
>

So why aren't you RC? Are you not saved?

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:

>> On the basis that a literal reading of 1-day == 24 hours is not
>>required by the text.
>>
>Based on what? Is it required then that God is the actual creator or
>that he even exists? The problem with allegoricalism is that its
>limits are never truly determined, they are always relative to the one
>who is doing the "determining". Who gets to say that within the same
>verse, this aspect is literal and that aspect is symbolic?

And yet, in another thread, you said that the 'literal' reading did
permit for metaphor, typology, etc. Which is it?

>> No. I do not believe in a literal interpretation of the Genesis record,
>> IF that means 7 24-hour days. Neither did the Church Fathers.