Features a history, board member information, operations summary, turnpike maps and photos, road conditions and toll information.

information on the Kansas Turnpike, including the K-Tag electronic toll collection system

ruth wrote:

> >
> > > Palestinian Covenant: Deut 30:1-10 "I will" 12 times
>
> It was not given to the philistines, the enemies
> of Israel. See Jer.47.
>
> >
> > > Davidic Covenant: II Sam 7:10-16 "I will" 7 times
>
> What makes this a covenant and not a promise?
>
There are actual 7 covenants in all. The first three--Edenic, Adamic,
Noahic--are made with all mankind in general. The next
four--Abrahamic, Mosaic, Palestinian, Davidic--are made totally or
primarily with and concerning Israel. The final one, the New covenant,
is to be established with Israel upon their national repentance, but
into its blessings present-day believers in Christ enter as being in
the Seed.

Of the final four, all are unconditional except the Mosaic covenant.
In this case, God proposed a relationship possibility ("If ye
will") to which Israel responded: "All that the LORD hath spoken,
we will do" (Ex. 19:5-8). On the basis of their acceptance, the
covenant was instituted (Ex. 19:9ff). All the other covenants were
simply announced by God and/or imposed. All promised blessings for
obedience and warned of discipline for disobedience.


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <129.04.15.05.798102000@srcbs.org>, Sarah Kanary says...

>In article <127.45.06.05.015502000@srcbs.org>, matthew_member@newsguy.com
>says...
>
>> >Do you love all Trinitarians everywhere as your own flesh
>> >and blood, and would you give your life rather than any one
>> >of them lose theirs?
>>
>> You are only asking this question because you live in the
>> persistent fantasy that you have this much love for your
>> fellow dupes in your cult. But you do not. If you did, you
>> would not confirm them in soul-destroying heresy.
>
>So the answer is "no."

No, that is not the answer. Why, the fact that you would even _propose_ that as
the answer shows how lacking in love you are. For that is not in my words at
all. You are putting words in my mouth. That is no act of love.

>The first and foremost fruit of holy spirit is love.
>Therefore, where love is lacking, so is holy spirit.

Therefore, you lack the Holy Spirit. For feeding us this unending flood of lies
about Scripture is NOT 'love'.

>"We belong to God, and anyone who knows God listens to us, while anyone who
>does not belong to God refuses to hear us. This is how we know the spirit of
>truth and the spirit of deceit. Beloved, let us love one another, because love
>is of God; everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God. Whoever i