Constantly updated news and headlines throughout the state.

Showcase of news articles about the people and cities of the state, from various media including newspapers.

Iowa's news and information network.

Features agricultural articles, market news, weather radar and forecasts, publications, subscription and contact information.

News on Iowa continually updated from thousands of sources around the net.

Links to latest news from Iowa newspapers.

Feature stories, arts, culture, "Discover Iowa".

Bob Felts wrote:
> Gary McNees wrote:

>
> You missed the point. According to Romans 7, where is the choice for
> sin made? Hint: the answer is in v. 20.
>

Perhaps we missed each other's points.

v, 20 "But if I am doing the very thing I do not wish, I am no longer
the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me."

My point was that Paul is saying that he DOES what he desires not to do.

This is contrary to Edwards theory of the will.

But I think I see your point. Is it your point that every time you sin,
you have an excuse because it is not you doing it, but "sin which dwells
in you?"

Gary


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

basicallyblues@hotmail.com wrote:

> okay I read them. You got STOMPED! I do give you credit though for
> providing the links. Too bad you can't see how impotent your
> unBiblical palaver is.

This from a guy complaining that someone else was posting
childish rants.


> yeah, whatever Steve. I've heard your opinion 3 times now. I care more
> about Pamlea Andersons's next mammogram than your opinion on JWs.

Who wouldn't be? (Oh, and I point out that you, who complained
about me dropping an 's' on 'deniers", has mispelled 'Pamela'.)


> You didn't address your blatant lie. How did *you* "thrash" me when we
> didn't even debate?

Wouldn't it be absurd and bizarre if boxing matches worked
this way? Two guys would slug it out for a while, and after
the final bell rang, they'd stand back and each declare himself
the winner. "I pommelled you" "No, I pommelled you" "Oh, no,
it was I who clearly hamburerized your face".......

It's the reason we have referees.

Why on earth do you think it carries any weight for you to
declare that you thrashed anyone? It's only a childish
taunt and means nothing because you're one of the boxers
and so you can't be the referee.

It's pretty clear that JW doctrine is based on untested
(and unscriptural) assumptions that anthropomorphize God.
Such as assuming God is bound by time, which He must
necessarily have created.

Note that your argument about Enoch is based on such a
temporal supposition.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:42:25 +0000 (UTC), Matthew Johnson
wrote:

>In article <77B26004-64A5-C1B3-AAE5-EEB60C414509@srcbs.org>, Mike Rhodes says...