"gilgames" wrote in message
news:E38201F7-4702-6894-1401-DCB30B067042@srcbs.org...
> <<
> So why does salvation work differently for adults (in your
system) than
> it does for infants? Why does God choose all infants,
but not all
> adults?
>
> Gary
> >>
>
> What about this answer.
>
> The infants born in the state of the original Sin a
collective
> responsibility, which received Salvation by the death and
Resurrection
> of Christ for everybody before and after that, unlike the
adults they
> did not made any obstacle for the salvation by personal
sins. The
> Passion before the death was necessary due to the personal
sins, and the
> Grace from that saves many but not all: this is personal
responsibility
> so requires personal cooperation.
>
> laszlo

Pretty good Laszlo.

But you will see, the opposition, i.e., Calvinists and Bart,
have an "answer" for everything. Never Scriptural, but,
none the less an answer.

All of their "dogmas" are based on the philosophies of man.
Particularly, Augustine, Calvin, and Luther - and those who
followed them into grievous error.

Gary



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <4E414846-F5E4-4197-A469-694529068E1A@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>Matthew Johnson wrote:

>>In article <0DC3C7E4-70F2-A7C2-B04F-604336B56185@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...

>> >Gary wrote:

>> >[...]


>> >> How do you know what infants believe or can believe? Further, I believe
>> >> that the work of Christ on the Cross made propiatition for all sin.
>> >> Hence God CAN save anyone He chooses to save.

>> >Even the person who resists His will?

>> Sure. Why not?

>Oh, because of everything you guys say.

"You guys"? My, my, Bob. I am not amazed that you resort to
fallacy, I am amazed that you resort to such a simple
fallacy so quickly.

After all, how could we fail to see through such a _simple_
case of the fallacy of composition.

>> Or do you think you can show how this would be equivalent to
>> "omnipotence achieving contradiction"?


>Of course I can't show that. The only people who _are_ saved are those
>who were saved against their will.

Wrong again. You make a total mockery of Psalm 1 by saying this.

Why, the reality is the very opposite of what you say. If it