Delaware - Office of the State Bank Commissioner

Regulates State-chartered banks and trust companies for safety and soundness and non-depository financial services licensees for compliance with applicable laws.

Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control

Mission to protect and manage the state's vital natural resources, protect public health and safety, provide quality outdoor recreation and to serve and educate the citizens about the wise use, conservation and enhancement of Delaware's Environment.

Delaware Department of State

Provides information about the functions and related services of this agency.

Delaware Division of Incorporations

The Delaware General Corporation Law is one of the most advanced and flexible corporation statutes in the nation.

Delaware Economic Development Office

Enhancing the quality of life for all Delawareans by facilitating the creation and retention of quality jobs.

Delaware Health and Social Services

Mission to improve the quality of life for Delaware's citizens by promoting health and well-being, fostering self-sufficiency, and protecting vulnerable populations.

Delaware Health and Social Services

Mission to improve the quality of life for Delaware's citizens by promoting health and well-being, fostering self-sufficiency, and protecting vulnerable populations.

Delaware Office of State Planning Coordination

Pursuing the continuous improvement of the coordination and effectiveness of land use decisions made by state, county, and municipal governments while building and maintaining a high quality of life in the State of Delaware.

Delaware Public Archives

Provides many valuable resources for researching vital statistics records (births, marriages, and deaths).

Delaware Solid Waste Authority - DSWA

Comprehensive information on waste management, recycling, composting, household hazardous waste, waste-to-energy, landfill engineering and community awareness.

In article <066.36.07.05.057119000@srcbs.org>, Bob says...
>
>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> In article <063.22.05.700570000@srcbs.org>, Bob says...
>>
>> >Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> >Ok, I questioned a Rabbi about this subject.
>>
>> Well, that is a significant improvement over your approach to this
>topic so far.
>
>Only in your opinion.

Oh really? If you didn't think it was an improvement yourself, why did you seek
out a Rabbi?

> In fact all I was getting was opinion

This isn't true. I gave you quite a lot of philological fact. Did you really not
even notice?

> so I seeked
>answers from a more knowledgeable person.

But you asked him the wrong questions. For you are still prating about the
possibility of Christian interpolation, although the Rabbi you consulted implied
that this is impossible.

>> > He stated that Gen 1:26
>> >("Let US make...")
>>
>> So are you finally convinced that your previous suggestion is
>impossible? Are
>> you finally convinced that it was impossible for Christian scribes to
>> interpolate this verse with the plurals 'us'?
>
>Absolutely not. Translations from the original text are always subject
>interpretation.

But not subject to ANY 'interpretation'. And if you had been paying attention,
you would have noticed that 'your Rabbi' implied that such interpolation is
impossible. So _your_ 'interpretation' (the one that claims that Christian
scribes modified the text) is out of the question. Perhaps you are too busy
defending the indefensible to notice.

>> >refers to God conferring with the angels as a
>> >courtesy to them during the "planning stage" for man's creation.
>>
>> But this explanation is also impossible. And its refutation was
>clinched long
>> ago, despite what your Rabbi says.
>
>Not MY Rabbi!

Yes, YOUR Rabbi. But not in the sense you take it here.

> I have no Rabbi since I am a Christian.

But THIS is wrong, too! If you really are a Christian, then your Rabbi is Christ
Himself.

> I sought
>information from a knowledgeable source. You have merely stated
>personal opinion.

Oh, no, I gave you much more than that. I gave you an analysis of the text that
can be easily verified by a great many people in the NG. You could even have
taken it to your Rabbi and had _him_check it. If you had done this, you would
have found that he would havec agreed that my _grammatical_ analysis was
correct, but that he still would disagreed with my conclusion about what the
plural refers to.

>> >However the actual creation of man in 1:27 is done singularly by
>God,
>