Identifies minority and women students who have the potential for college and encourages students to pursue careers in mathematics, science, engineering and technology.

Pre-engineering education program fostering math, science engineering and technology.

Offers classes in Hartford and Weston for K-12 and adults and has a two track curriculum for non-native speakers, native and near-native speakers.

Information on charter schools, endowed and incorporated academies, regional vocational agriculture centers and other educational institutions, provided in PDF format.

In article <98BD8DC2-F286-3C33-2EDD-728AABC0004A@srcbs.org>,
yankit@netvision.net.il says...
>
>I'm just looking for the commentary on Zech. 8:18-19
>I have it in Latin but I need the English translation.

Since it is only on two verses, why not post the whole commentary and one of us
can translate it for you?


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <091.34.08.05.946118000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>Bob Felts wrote concerning Mark 10:18:
>
>>Then you have a problem. If no one is good, except God, then you have
>>to admit that Jesus was not good.
>>If Jesus wasn't good, then He wasn't the spotless lamb of God, and all
>>of us are still in our sins.
>
>that's rather a pedantic take on it.

Is it? Even if it is, it is far, far less pedantic than your many excuses for
ignoring what Scripture must mean when it says "Enoch did not see death (Heb
11:5)".

> Jesus rebuked the man who
>addressed him with the title "Good Teacher," because Jesus
>recognized not himself but his Father to be the standard of goodness.

No, that is not why. Rather, He rebuked him because the title "Good teacher" was
entirely inappropriate for Him, since He is _far_ more than just a "Good
teacher".

In fact, what He taught was that He was the consubtantial Son of the Father,
even if He never said it in so many words.

>(Mark 10:17, 18) However, to measure up to what people generally mean
>when they say that someone is good, Jesus surely must have been
>truthful. Indeed, even his enemies acknowledged that he was. (Mark
>12:14) Likely the young man used "good" as a title, so Jesus let
>him know that such a title belongs to God alone.

Right. And this means that He must have been truthful when He answered Philip
(who had just asked Him to 'show us the Father') with:

How long have I been with you and you still do not know Me?
He who sees Me sees the Father.

>Also, consider that Jesus was fully aware of the story of Job when God
>called him "blameless" so Christ was not contradicting that.
>
>The more important point is that Jesus separated himslef from God,
>which he is not.

No, He _never_ separated Himself! On the contrary: the very verse you so love to
quote, claiming that it shows even Enoch died, shows that even while He was
speaking to Nicodemus, He was at th