Business and Economy
Sub-Categories: Advertising and Marketing | Agriculture and Forestry | Animals | Automotive | Beauty and Cosmetic Services | Business to Business | Classifieds | Computers and Internet | Construction and Maintenance | Directories | Economic Development | Employment | Entertainment and Media | Event Planning | Financial Services | Food and Beverage | Home and Garden | Industrial | Legal Services | Organizations | Printing | Public Utilities | Real Estate | Restaurants and Bars | Services | Shipping, Storage and Logistics | ShoppingSearchable, interelated data resources, including real estate information and transactions, residential and commercial, employment, demographics, crime, education and retail.
The Connecticut QuarterInformation on the last coin in the 50 State Quarters Program to be issued in 1999. From the U.S. Mint.
Bart Goddard wrote:
> paul4deb@hawknet.com.au wrote:
>
>
>>I take "destruction" to mean what it's plainest meaning is--the ACT of
>>destroying or the PROCESS of being destroyed. Whether it is the act or
>>the process would depend on context. Either way, destruction in itself
>>implies an outcome:
>
>
> And here we're talking about _eternal destruction_, so the ACT or the
> PROCESS must be an eternal ACT or PROCESS. You can't have point
> events in eternity.
>
But it does not say the destruction is "in eternity". "everlasting" in
this verse is the adjective, not the noun.
Take the expression "everlasting consolation" (AV) in the same book:
"Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and our God and Father, who has
loved us and given [us] _everlasting consolation_ and good hope by
grace" (2 Thess 2:16 AV).
The NIV has this as "eternal encouragment".
We don't understand the expression to mean that the consoling is a
process that is going on continually, but rather, that by His grace, God
has consoled us through His love; and that state of having been consoled
will endure forever.
>
>>If we say "everlasting destruction" means a process that inflicts
>>conscious pain upon someone forever--ie without end, then we turn
>>"everlasting destruction" into a kind of oxymoron i.e. indestructible
>>destruction. I find this unscriptural.
>
>
> You haven't explained how, in eternity, someone can be punished
> for a while and then ceased to be punished. There is no concept
> of "ceasing" without time, because for something to "cease", it
> has to happen at one time and then stop happening at another.
>
> You're not being logical.
I am being scriptural. I read in Malachi 4:1-3, that their will be a
"day" that shall burn as an oven. This event does not happen in
eternity but in "time"--"the day(yowm)cometh":
"For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the
proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that
cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it shall leave
them neither root nor branch. 2 But unto you that fear my name shall
the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall
go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. 3 And ye shall tread
down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet
in the day that I shall do [this], saith the LORD of hosts." (Mal 4:1-3 AV)
'Ashes under the soles of your feet' implies utter destruction.
For "Dust thou art, unto dust shalt thou return."
There is a point event when "fire comes down from God out of heaven"
(Rev 20:9) and there is a point event when they will be consumed, burnt
up and left "neither root nor branch".