Home and Garden
Manufacturers of wine racking, saunas, and steambaths. Branch locations included.
Dan's Fan CityRetailer of ceiling fans and accessories with locations throughout the eastern half of the United States; includes product descriptions, store locator, and tech support.
International Association Of Dinnerware MatchersAn organization that offers replacement and matching services for discontinued patterns of china, crystal, silver, stainless, sterling and collectibles. Includes online pattern search, purpose of the group, and opportunity to sell a place setting.
The Robert Baker CompaniesProducers and wholesale suppliers of a wide range of fruit, shade and ornamental trees and shrubs, at several locations around the country. Includes terms and conditions, location maps, and general information about products.
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 04:00:00 +0000 (UTC), "Bibledriller"
>Can anyone tell me the meaning of the Bible verse 1 Corinthian 15:3-4? My
>difficulty in understanding of the verse is how the acts (died, buried,
>raised) itself can be "according to Scriptures " Another is that does the
>"three days" not related to the "according to Scriptures" in grammar?
>
>Bibledriller
>
1 Corinthians 15:3-4 MKJV
(3) For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received,
that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures,
(4) and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day
according to the Scriptures;
For those who don't know, I reject Paul & his 'scriptures', and have
posted on that repeatedly.
So from that perspective, Paul seems to be saying, indirectly to his
other Jews who are not Christians, that he is _not_ saying Christ rose
again. Someone else did. They all knew who does say Christ rose, and
that someone else did not include the scriptures of his time. By
speaking the reverse, he's noting there are no scriptures to validate
the event to the Jews. And he won't either.
I believe Paul's gospel stresses the crucifixion. Meaning he believes
it was the proper thing for the Jews to do to the Son of God (though
he did not _actually_ believe that was who Christ is). And by Romans
11:28-29 he proves he believes the Jews need not repent for it. And
he worked hard to ensure Christians did not automatically condemn them
for it, unto expected (deserved) punishment.
Romans 11:28-29 MKJV
(28) Indeed as regards the gospel, they [Jews] are enemies for your
sakes. But as regards the election, they are beloved for the fathers'
sakes.
(29) For the free gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
Should we blame them?
Luke 23:34 And Jesus said, Father, forgive them, for they do not know
what they do. And parting His clothing, they cast lots.
However...
John 19:11 Jesus answered, You could have no authority against Me
unless it were given to you from above. Therefore he who delivered Me
to you has the greater sin.
I'll trust John before Luke, or Paul.
--
Mike
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
Loren wrote:
>Your entire objection here is answered by the kenosis. You refuse to
>appreciate the Second Person of the Godhead "giving up" the use of His
>Deity.
At Rev. 3:2,12 Jesus was back in heaven at God's right hand still calls
him "my God" four times. Kenosis has no bearing on this- or are you
saying Jesus gave up his Godship indefinitely? Jesus has asked at John