Alaska Region Headquarters

Headquarters for the Alaska Region, provides regional forecasts and warnings and contacts to Alaska forecast offices.

Alaska Region Headquarters

Headquarters for the Alaska Region, provides regional forecasts and warnings and contacts to Alaska forecast offices.

Alaska River Forecast Center

Complete river data.

Alaska River Forecast Center

Complete river data.

Alaska Tsunami Warning Center

Providing information about tsunamis and earthquakes throughout Alaska and the West Coast.

Alaska Tsunami Warning Center

Providing information about tsunamis and earthquakes throughout Alaska and the West Coast.

Alaska Weather

Current conditions, seven day forecasts, and area maps for selected cities.

Alaska Weather

Current conditions, seven day forecasts, and area maps for selected cities.

National Weather Service

Alaska region.

National Weather Service

Alaska region.

"Bob Felts" wrote in message
news:1069FC52-F998-711F-F9B2-FB1577A104D9@srcbs.org...
> Gary wrote:
>
> >
>
> Not relevant, since God saves who He wants to save.

God wants ALL men to be saved! He said so.
1 Timothy 2:4 who wants all men to be saved and to come to a
knowledge of the truth.

God only saves those who believe the Gospel.

>
> > BTW, I believe that God saves all infants dying in
infancy.
> >
>
> But why? Do you rely on the unscriptural concept of the
"age of
> accountability" which denies our connection to Adam?

It doesn't.

Gary



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

kent@ccountry.net wrote:
>>Sure there is. The string of rhetorical questions (vs. 14
>>15) show this absolutely. One might argue that they are
>>not rhetorical questions, but since they are not answered
>>in Paul's argument, we know that they are, in fact, rhetorical.
>>The answer is assumed and ovious: They _can't_ believe
>>in Whom they have not heard. There's no other way to
>>read this passage.
>>
>
> At first glance what you say appears to be true.

There's a good reason for that.


> By doing so he
> can make no claim (nor does he) for the exclusivity of hearing,
> for within the context of the immediate passages he quotes is
> another answer:

Asking rhetorical questions IS making the claim.



> "For they shall see what has not been told them,
> Shall behold what they never have heard." Isaiah 52, JPS
>
> So much for "only", "alone", "absolutely", "no other way". This
> does not diminish the importance of Paul's message, but it does
> remove the limitations you've attempted to impose.

If it were true, then it would diminish Pal's message. But it's
not. Isaiah is talking about Heaven, not faith. You need to
answer the question: If man doesn't get faith by hearing (in
a broad sense of the word which wouldn't exclude the deaf or
retarded or infants) then _how_ will he get faith?

"God gives it to him" is not an answer. I'm saying that God
gives it to him _only_ through the word. So the question is
"If God doesn't give it through the Word, then how does He
give it?"


>>I can ask the same rhetorical question as Paul: If it is not
>>the Word which creates faith, then how can it be created?
>>
>
> Ah, _other things_. It seems to me you're equivocating just
> a bit and that's probably a good thing. Is your definition of
> hearing, in reality, perception?

I don't equivocate. (This word is getting wa