Alaska National Parks and Forests - Bell's Alaska Canada Travel Guide

Includes in-depth descriptions of towns, highways, ferries, history, accommodations, camping, railroads, fishing, visitor attractions and what to see and do.

Alaska National Parks and Forests - Bell's Alaska Canada Travel Guide

Includes in-depth descriptions of towns, highways, ferries, history, accommodations, camping, railroads, fishing, visitor attractions and what to see and do.

Alaska State Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation

Information on hiking trails, history, archaeology, historic preservation office, cabins, camping, campgrounds, boating, boating safety, and volunteers.

Alaska State Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation

Information on hiking trails, history, archaeology, historic preservation office, cabins, camping, campgrounds, boating, boating safety, and volunteers.

Alaska State Parks Public Use Cabins

Alaska State parks offers over 40 cabins for rent by the public.

Alaska State Parks Public Use Cabins

Alaska State parks offers over 40 cabins for rent by the public.

Chena River State Recreation Area

Amphibians, bears, trails, canoe the Chena River, campgrounds, picnic areas and map. Community service project by the Two Rivers Elementary School.

Chena River State Recreation Area

Amphibians, bears, trails, canoe the Chena River, campgrounds, picnic areas and map. Community service project by the Two Rivers Elementary School.

In article <092.03.05.05.080257000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>Matthew Johnson:
>
>>It is good that you apologized. But please keep in mind that Steve is
>not the
>>_only_ one who feels this way upon reading your 'rebuttals'. ON the
>contrary: >it
>>seems to be a regular habit with you, one you will have to overcome if
>you >want
>>a _shred_ of credibility in this NG.
>
>The irony here is tragic. You, the king of ad hominem and dishonest
>quoting, is talking about MY habits? Have you no shame?

As so many others have already pointed out, it is YOU who are the "king of ad
hominem and dishonest quoting" in this thread, not me.


[snip]
>read Luke 6:42

I have read it many times. That is why I knew better than to do as you did,
entering this NG with fantastic and absurd accusations of 'apostasy' and
'heresy' and 'idolatry'.

No one in this thread is more in need of changing his ways based on Luke 6:42
than you are.

>>Private REVELATION is forbidden
>
>>No, it is not. You are misquoting Peter.
>
>wasn't quoting Peter

Then you are STILL wrong, and have even _less_ biblical basis for your false
assertion.

>> and THAT is what the trinity is. But on
>>the question of "private interpretations" did you read 2 Pet. 1:20?
>
>>Of course he did. And he offered a far more logical interpretation of
>it >than you do.
>
>Matthew all you are capable of is diagreeing and contradicting what I
>post.

Stop posting such blatant fallacies and pernicious nonsense. Who can say
_anything_ about yoru posts without disagreeing with you? And who can disagree
with you _without_ being accused of doing nothing but?

> It's really immature.

It's also really not what I do. If you would spend more time reading the
responses your posts have elicited and less time posting drivel, you would have
noticed this by now. I have refuted your nonsense many posts ago. But you
ignored the refutations, resorting to the very ad hominem you whine about when
others allegedly do it to you. Is _that_ your idea of "really mature"?

> There's no substance from you just blanket
>denials.

That is not true. There is a lot of substance. But you ignored the substance and
turned right away to ad hominem attacks, calling us 'idolators'.

>Steve didn't even comment on this verse in our posts.

Prove it. I think you just didn't read his post.

> This
>proves you don't even bother to read the posts you just want to
>contradict what I say at any cost because you have a prejudice against