Children arrested outside Terri Schiavo's Hospice
__________________________________________________________________________________




PINELLAS PARK, Florida.
March 26, 2005.




It's not just adult protesters getting arrested outside the Florida hospice housing Terri Schiavo
(SHY'-voh) this week.

Children were on the front lines of the demonstrations.

Six children ranging in age from ten to 14 were arrested in the past week for crossing a police line
at the Woodside Hospice in an attempt to get water to the brain damaged woman.

One ten-year-old North Carolina boy says police were nice, but seemed a bit annoyed.

He adds "We were smiling for Jesus and they didn't like that much."

Young kids also passed out religious fliers and held signs accusing Michael Schiavo, Terri's husband,
of murdering her.

One seven-year-old girl sat outside the hospice with a piece of red tape emblazoned with the word
"LIFE" plastered across her mouth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.onnnews.com/Global/story.asp?S=3128712

__________________________________________________________________________________


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

In article <168.20.16.05.519713000@srcbs.org>, entropy says...

>matthew_member@newsguy.com wrote...

>>In article <167.11.08.05.679261000@srcbs.org>, peter.gibbs@charter.net says...

>> >You guys crack me up with your insistence on "right
>> >understanding", "correct doctrine", and, for Christ's sake, proper
>> >spelling?!

>> >I would suggest that: a) there is insufficient evidence to
>> >establish with certainty whether Jesus meant "tell you today",
>> >"today with me in heaven", or for that matter was being
>> >intentionally ambiguous; and

>> >b) it really isn't all that important, as neither right
>> >understanding, correct doctrine, nor proper spelling will save you
>> >(except perhaps in a spelling bee.)

>> >Only by the grace of God, which is a free gift, are we saved.

>> You wont' here this often, but I have to agree with Bart here. You
>> are being contradictory, if not even hypocritical, by insisting
>> that doctrine is not important, but then turning around and
>> repeating a doctrine.

>That's baloney.

Wrong. The 'baloney' is yours.

> What's wrong with your critique is that it equates
>the degree of doctrine in this: