Prayer for life

Southeast

Sub-Categories: Travel and Tourism | Travel and Tourism
Alaska Power and Telephone Company

Power utilities, hydro projects, telecommunications, wireless, Internet access, phone cards, pagers, VHF radios.

Alaska Power and Telephone Company

Power utilities, hydro projects, telecommunications, wireless, Internet access, phone cards, pagers, VHF radios.

Intersea Foundation

Non-profit organization offering Alaska whale research expeditions. Whale photo gallery, sound archives, lectures, scientific achievements, history of vessels, publications, and Cynthia D'Vincent biography.

Intersea Foundation

Non-profit organization offering Alaska whale research expeditions, photo gallery, sound archives, lectures, scientific achievements, history of vessels, publications, and Cynthia D'Vincent biography.

Intersea Foundation

Non-profit organization offering Alaska whale research expeditions. Whale photo gallery, sound archives, lectures, scientific achievements, history of vessels, publications, and Cynthia D'Vincent biography.

Intersea Foundation

Non-profit organization offering Alaska whale research expeditions, photo gallery, sound archives, lectures, scientific achievements, history of vessels, publications, and Cynthia D'Vincent biography.

Southeast Conference

Information on economic and social development. Links to other organizations.

Southeast Conference

Information on economic and social development. Links to other organizations.

Southeast Region

Overview of the region, with a directory of activities, lodging, and transportation.

Southeast Region

Overview of the region, with a directory of activities, lodging, and transportation.



In article <173.53.11.05.406554000@srcbs.org>, lsenders@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>
>Gary McNees wrote:
>> Two Calvinists, Bob and Loren, and one Lutheran, Bart, on this list
>> have asserted that I do not understand Calvinism. They further assert that I
>> misrepresent Calvinism, and malign Calvinism unjustly.
>>
>Whaaaaa! Whaaaa! Whaaaaaa!

Such a mature response, Loren!

But of course, I don't really expect better from anyone so addicted to Reform
eisegesis.

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Matthew Johnson wrote:
> In article ,
>
> I understand the implication of the tenses fully. But I do NOT find
any support
> for your disastrous bad dogma in any of John's epistles.
>

That's because your fail in your theology from the very start in
disallowing the sin of Adam passing onto the entire **race** of which
he was a federal representative (Rom 5). So the very presuppositions
out of which you form your system of theology is wrong. Get the
foundation off kilter just a bit and the entire house is out of wack.

The "disastrous bad dogma" is your refusal to accept the depravity of
man, -mankind.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Stephen M. Adams wrote:

> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >> >Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> >> >> wrf3@stablecross.com (Bob Felts) writes:
> >>
> >> >> >There were divisions in the Church long before the Protestants came
> >> >> >along, were there not?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, and the vast majority of them caused by private interpretation
> >> >> of Scripture without reference to the traditional teachings of the
> >> >> church.
> >> >
> >> >Let's go back to a post you made to s.r.c.b-s on 12/8/04, in which you
> >> >wrote to Matthew Johnson:
> >> >
> >> > I've read Augustine - and my reaction to things like "On
> >> > Predestination" were seminal in my discovery of the Orthodox
> >> > Church...
> >> >
> >> >You were not Orthodox, you became Orthodox, but you did so based upon
> >> >your evaluation of the evidence. So it seems to me that you used the
> >> >very principle you d