By Locality
In article <136.15.10.05.731061000@srcbs.org>, Bart Goddard says...
>
>lsenders@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> There is NO correct
>> interpretation without the leading of the Spirit.
>
>This attitude separates the Spirit from His work. Scripture
>IS the leading of the Spirit;
Then how did the Pharisees and Sadducees know Scripture so well, and yet fail to
see that the Scriptures speak of Christ? Are you really willing to believe that
they too had the leading of the Spirit and yet failed so badly?
[snip]
>Surely the Dallas Theological Seminary has been thoroughly
>discredited by now.
It has? Please tell us more about this. After all, there are certain posters in
this NG who _still_ paint the DTS in very rosy colors. So somebody needs to
correct the spotless image they present of DTS;)
--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
<<
gpatton@bayou.com
I think it was probably around the same time the ass (of Numbers
chapter 22) lost his speaking ability. What do you think?
>>
God's good angel was behind Balam's ass, and God's bad angle the Satan
appared as a serpent in Gen 3.
laszlo
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
bdratzsch@aol.com wrote:
> Difficult question can arise here, however. We were well acquainted
> with a situation in which the husband attempted to murder his wife.
If society handled the situation as it should, society would, with all
deliberate speed, see that she became a widow, and as such, she could
avoid divorce and then could marry again (or stay single). If she
chooses to take another husband, hopefully she will make a better
choice the second time around.
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>> >>
>> >The "notitia," the "fundamentals" of the faith are not vagaries. They
>> >are not exhaustive but then they are not vague either. We, the called,
>> >the enlightened, the elected, the regenerated, know Whom we believe in.
>>
>> Funny, the vast majority of Christians who are now living, or who have
>> ever lived, disagree with your fundamental doctrines.
><