matthew_member@newsguy.com wrote:

>> Gary keeps saying that
>>"free will" is an expression of God's love and that God
>>would never "force" anyone to believe. It'll be
>>interesting to see how much longer Gary can hold on to
>>his contradiction.
>
> Well, since Gary does not share your false premise concerning the
> meaning of the omnipotence of God,

The issue has nothing to do with the omnipotence of God.
You lose again.

Bart


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

"Bart Goddard" wrote in message
news:151.00.15.05.563553000@srcbs.org...
>
>
> gkmcnees@comcast.net wrote:
>
snip

> > Had God not sent His Son, then there could be no Gospel promise
> > to believe, and thereby to be saved.
>
> Right. You teach that all Jesus did was buy us a "chance" to
> get saved. This is contrary to a doctrine that says "Jesus
> saves". I believe Jesus redeemed men, not chances.

I would prefer the word "opportunity" as opposed to chance.
Like God says, "that He MIGHT have mercy upon all."

snip

> >> >> There's that as yet unsupported link between cause and
> >> >> responsibility.
> >> >
> >> > Responsibility = ability to respond.
> >>
> >> Have you supported this little equation with Scripture
> >> yet? No. In spite of being asked multiple times.
> >
> > Sound reason demands that their is no responsibility where there is no
> > ability to respond. It is not rational to hold someone responsible
> > when they could not have responded.
>
> So your reason is that "it must be reasonable"?

Is it reasonable that an "a" is an "a?"

> How can you say it's not rational to hold someone responsible
> when they could not have responded, when we do this all the
> time in our society. And we all applaud when these irresponsible
> people get their come-uppance. Some idiot is yacking on her
> cell phone and doesn't see the little kid in time and
> smacks him with her car. She didn't choose to hit the kid.
> She didn't even know that hitting the kid was an option on
> the table. But we all agree that she's responsible for being
> irresponsible.

Actually, this case has happened twice recently here in
Florida. In both cases the person drove through a red
light and kill someone.

All the law did was to take away their licsense.
Big woop.

I think that they should have been guilty of a minimum
of manslaughter.

> > Therefore,