Kachemak Heritage Land Trust

A non-profit corporation to preserve for public benefit, land with significant natural, recreational, or cultural values.

Kachemak Heritage Land Trust

A non-profit corporation to preserve for public benefit, land with significant natural, recreational, or cultural values.

Kachemak Heritage Land Trust

A non-profit corporation to preserve for public benefit, land with significant natural, recreational, or cultural values.

Kachemak Heritage Land Trust

A non-profit corporation to preserve for public benefit, land with significant natural, recreational, or cultural values.

Kenai Canoe Trails

Offers guided tours and books about canoe tours in the upper part of the peninsula. Includes maps of the Swan Lake and Swanson River canoe routes.

Kenai Canoe Trails

Offers guided tours and books about canoe tours in the upper part of the peninsula. Includes maps of the Swan Lake and Swanson River canoe routes.

Kenai Peninsula Bed and Breakfast Association

Inspected lodging, including cabins, lodges, suites, and cottages. Use online inquiry form for questions.

Kenai Peninsula Bed and Breakfast Association

Inspected lodging, including cabins, lodges, suites, and cottages. Use online inquiry form for questions.

Kenai Peninsula Borough

Helpful information for both the first time visitor to the borough and borough residents.

Kenai Peninsula Borough

Helpful information for both the first time visitor to the borough and borough residents.

lsenders@hotmail.com wrote:

>
> That's not the point of the argument at all. The point is that ALL
> scripture is inspired. The point is that a proverb has just as much
> authority as does a direct quote of Christ. Truth is truth. There is
> but Author and He alone is reason for the Authority of Scripture
> standing over everything of man, esp. his traditions. Man must first
> be interpreted by what is revealed concerning him in scripture. From
> that basis and that basis alone can he then proceed on to interpret
> scripture for himself. Sola scriptura.

Matthew 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live
by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

But every word of God is not equally important to life. The genealogies
of the OT (some of them) are not nearly as important as:Acts 16:30 And
brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? 31 And
they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved,
and thy house.

And some passages are much easier to understand than others.

The problem is that the Calvinistic system is built upon incorrect
"logic." The Calvinist takes some Scriptures which he does not
understand and uses them to build a system. This system contradicts
multitudes of plain Scriptures. Now he must take these plain simple
Scriptures and somehow make them say the very opposite of what they
actually do say.

Now, this would be bad enough if these passages were not so important
and the resulting system not so blasphemous of God.

But what this system teaches is that rather than God being a God who is
LOVE, the God they manufacture is actually a God that hates most humans!

Further, since this God is infinitely powerful, He can then create
creatures with no free will, such that they cannot be saved, and then
torture them for eternity! What Love is This?

Gary

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC), lsenders@hotmail.com wrote:

>Mike Rhodes wrote:
>> Note: This post uses 2 Peter 3 as its reference. I had assumed this
>> was actually Peter's letter, but then found a discussion saying some
>> early authorities don't believe Peter wrote this. Having read that I
>> now tend to agree. It seems that the writer's purpose was to do war
>> against Paul's error, and may have assumed Peter's identity just for
>> that reason. Nevertheless, I agree with his reason, whether or not
>> Peter actually wrote it.
>>
>> But if Peter didn't write it then Peter didn't call Paul "beloved,"
>> nor his wr