Artists
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Lithographic prints of original art by Keith Appel, one of Alaska's premier artists. These are beautiful and reasonable priced prints.
Alaska Art - Prints of Alaska outdoor activities and wildlifeLithographic prints of original art by Keith Appel, one of Alaska's premier artists. These are beautiful and reasonable priced prints.
Alaska Art PrintsSpecializing in wildlife, landscape and nostalgic gold mining scenes, Alaskan artist Vernon Cross seeks to bring to life the Alaska he sees around him.
Alaska Art PrintsSpecializing in wildlife, landscape and nostalgic gold mining scenes, Alaskan artist Vernon Cross seeks to bring to life the Alaska he sees around him.
Alaska Aurora ArtistsDrawings, Photographs, Digital Art and Videos of Alaska's Aurora. See the amazing beauty of the Northern Lights.
Alaska Aurora ArtistsDrawings, Photographs, Digital Art and Videos of Alaska's Aurora. See the amazing beauty of the Northern Lights.
Alaska Hunter's ShackCarver Michael Sausedo, brings the natural beauty of the antler to life using the art of relief carving
Alaska Hunter's ShackCarver Michael Sausedo, brings the natural beauty of the antler to life using the art of relief carving
Alaska Wildlife ArtLimited edition prints and original paintings of Alaskan wild life by Talkeetna artist, David Totten.
Alaska Wildlife ArtLimited edition prints and original paintings of Alaskan wild life by Talkeetna artist, David Totten.
In article <084.40.09.05.330120000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>>Your arguments are nothing new. THey are
>>weak and are based upon not only poor scholarship, but revisionistic
>>history.
>
>Um, prove it.
Why are you "shifting the burden"? You didn't prove most of your accusations
either. Yet you get all huffy and insist, "prove it" when others do the same to
you.
>To any objective viewer the postings here show that every
>assertion made by you and Matthew has been debunked.
It is easy to make that claim, but when you do so, all you prove is that you
have never _listened_ to an "objective observer". If you had, you would have
been in for a rude shock.
> Both of you use
>the typical trinitarian tactics 1) quickly change topics when you are
>proven wrong- never finishing any topic
That is not true. I finished the topics of Enoch and Elijah not dying and of why
Ignatius's quote of Prv 8:22 does NOT imply that Christ was created. It is YOU
who had to snip what I said without commentary or rebuttal in your replies,
which were brimming with scandalous charges against all Trinitarians.
So it is YOU who uses typical _anti-trinitarian_ tactics: relying on debunked
revisionist history, pretending to know the meaning of Greek words even while
you contradict the written testimony of native speakers of the language etc,
etc.
> 2) use ad hominem
Only a hopeless whiner enters a newsgroup as you have done, accusing wide swaths
of Christians of being 'idolators' and 'apostates', and _then_ complains that
others are using 'ad hominem' against him.
Are you _really_ this eager to prove to the whole newsgroup what a whiner you
are? If you really can't stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen.
>and negative
>campaigning when you are proven wrong,
Two problems here: it was _you_ that started the "negative campaigning", and no,
neither of us have been "proven wrong". You haven't a clue what 'proof' is, as
you showed by listing a long list of verses which do NOT support you, and then
proclaiming your marvellous achievement as 'proof'.
>such as using the "cult" tag or
>using strawmen to prove your point 3) attempt to discredit any source
>that doesn't agree with your subjective interpretation, such as
>complaining about Bible translations, lexicons, manuscripts, etc...
What? Suddenly every complaint about translations and lexicons is "discrediting
sources"? Do you _like_ the "Breech's Bible"? Or how about the Douay? Are
_those_ fine translations in your book?
Our 'complaints' about translations are perfectly valid. Your failure to
understand translation issues