Prayer for life

Travel and Tourism

Sub-Categories: Attractions | Guides and Directories | Lodging | National Parks and Monuments | State Parks | Travel Services
Alabama Bureau of Tourism and Travel Official European Website

Includes information on holiday activities, golf, features and facts about the state, lists tour operators available, links, state history and parks, and contact details.

Alabama Mountain Lakes Tourist Association

Discover the excitement of north Alabama.

Alabama, The Best of the US

Includes some history, scenic attractions, facts about the state of Alabama and related links.

Bama Vacation Station

Offers vacation packages in Orlando, Florida. Includes photos, descriptions and reservations.

Heritage-Trails.com

Tours in Montgomery, Selma, Tuskegee and Birmingham. Also a guide to minority businesses throughout the South Eastern Region.

Roadside America - Alabama Attractions

State offbeat attractions, roadtrip sights and virtual vacation highlights.



Bob Travis wrote:
> In the KJV I read something that goes something like this: "when God
made
> Adam and Eve they were naked. But sin came into the world, and sin
distorts
> anything. Sin distorts nakedness. Immediately Adam and Eve knew they
were
> naked, and they tried to make a pair of pants out of fig leaves. They
still
> saw their nakedness."
>
> Today there is a common saying among some evanegelists that no people
are
> "junk" because God doesn't make junk.
>
> My question is this, if God created Adam and Even naked, why after
eating
> from the tree of knowledge, why would it matter to Adam and Eve that
they
> were any less than the people God created and if God made them naked
why
> would they be ashamed for anyone to see them naked. The Bible seems
to infer
> nakedness is bad, but if nakedness is bad why would God have created
them
> naked.

Nakedness does not bother God, but it does bother many sinners.
Nakedness does not bother God because God is sane.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

"Sarah Kanary" writes:
>"Stephen M. Adams" wrote:
>
>>>Well, of course the OT was written and collected long before there
>>>was any hint of the Orthodox Church.
>>
>> You are mistaken. The One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, which
>> is the Orthodox Church existed BEFORE the collection of the Scriptures
>> by ANY reckoning.
>
>Please explain. The last book of what is commonly called the "Old
>Testament" was written over 400 years before any church existed.

Written. But not collected. At least not as you mean it. YOUR
collection of books was determined in the 16th and 17th centuries.
LONG after the Orthodox Church came into being.

Now, if you want to refer to the ACTUAL collection of the OT, then
you might have a point. But not the collection YOU refer to as the
OT.

>>>We disagree upon which precedes which. I believe that God gave
>>>the Scripture to the Church, not that the Church gave the Scripture
>>>to us.
>>
>> The Church wrote, collected, compiled and transmitted the body of the
>> canon.
>
>The individual books of the "NT" were written by individual Jewish
>Christians, most of whom were apostles of Christ. The canon closed with the
>death of the apostle John.

Just who do you think the church is? Those individual Jewish Christians
were members of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. And that
IS the Orthodox Church.

>>The church existed BEFORE the first book of the NT