Alabama Alumni Net

Contact alumni of Alabama schools.

Alabama Association for Gifted Children

AAGC is an organization that brings parent, teachers, and other individuals together to support gifted education in the state. Purpose and goals, newsletter, conference updates, and links.

Alabama Association for Gifted Children

AAGC is an organization that brings parent, teachers, and other individuals together to support gifted education in the state. Purpose and goals, newsletter, conference updates, and links.

Alabama Colleges and Universities

Features telephone numbers, email addresses, online applications, scholarship and financial aid information, and web site links.

Alabama Cooperative Extension System

Operates as the primary educational outreach organization for the land-grant function of Alabama A&M and Auburn University. Site features news, calendar, and resource areas.

Alabama Cooperative Extension System

The Alabama Cooperative Extension System operates as the primary outreach organization for the land-grant function of Alabama A&M and Auburn University. Site features news, calendar, and resource areas.

Alabama Cooperative Extension System

The mission of the county programs are simply to take research-based knowledge and education from the land-grant universities to people in counties throughout Alabama who need it.

Alabama Department of Education

State level official education web site. Includes news, sections, calendar, legislation, school information, reports, publications and contact details.

Alabama Department of Education

State level official education web site.

Alabama Distance Learning Association

Works to promote distance learning in Alabama.

Stephen M. Adams wrote:
> lsenders@hotmail.com writes:
>
> >I wrote and sent of a lengthy reply to this post. I guess it must have
> >got lost. I was hoping you had merely chosen not to post it until you
> >could post a reply. Oh well.
>
> What you describe is not my practice. If I recieve a post that is on
> topic, I post it. If it's not, I attempt to return it via email. This
> often fails for a host of reasons. I checked my logs and can not find
> any record of such a post from you.
>
Its' been almost 8 yrs since I was involved with tech services. But I
still haven't forgotten how it all works. I never intended any
inference accusing you of any administrative mischief. Honestly, I
leave these things in the Lord's hands.

> One more time - my rejection of "sola Scriptura" is based on the Scriptures.
> They refute it. The Scriptures support *our* position, not yours.
>
> As for a definative list, I'll provide one as soon as you can provide
> a definitive list of Scriptures, using ONLY the Scriptures themselves.
>
Is this how you reply to someone who asks you to prove that Jesus is
real? This sort of reply is really immature. It is also
disrespectful. For I am honest in my search. I have honestly sought
out just what these "traditions" are which supersede the scriptures.
IMHO, part of being made in the image of God is that man is reasonable.
Therefore, when one declares that there is something beside what God
has provided in the written word which it at least it's equal (though
as I have stated, they can no more be equal than serving God & mammon)
in authority, it is reasonable that such a one declare what that is
-exactly. If it remains undeclared, then it is immediately open to
suspect for there is no object means of verification for there is no
definition. It floats on the ocean of relativity where all humanistic
venues necessarily traffic.

So my question was not to defame you, but rather to seek definition.
If you can't provide a listing of these "traditions" and their origin,
then why should anyone grant them a second thought? Is that an
unreasonable request.

1 Cor. 14:33 for God is not a God of confusion. . .

> >Also, in this reply of yours, you repeatedly made statements that led
> >me to believe that you believe in total depravity. You stated that man
> >cannot of himself save himself. This indicates two things. 1) Man is
> >ruined. 2) he doesn't really have free will. He is a slave.
>
> No, it does not. It indicates that without *grace* man can not do
> these things, but God gives grace to all men to *enable* them to do
> them. Yours is a false dichotomy - known in formal logic as the
> "either or" fallacy.
>
It is also termed, antithetical thought. When God gave the Decalogue,
He again illustrated the fact that He ho